Orbio AI

Name: Orbio AI
Brand: Orbio AI

AI Native

Orbio is an AI-native HR system that puts HR teams and entire organizations in motion.

Est 2025|Valuation $97.8M|Raised $27.6M

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 55K|FTEs 20|HQ Madrid, Spain

MarketsApplicant Tracking Systems (ATS)Sourcing & Recruitment Marketing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus modern ATS vendors (Greenhouse/Lever): Orbio’s differentiator is the vendor-described multi-agent automation and conversational/voice capabilities. Greenhouse and Lever provide mature ATS and CRM functionality with larger partner ecosystems and more extensive third-party review coverage; achieving similar automation may require additional tools. - Versus suite vendors (Workday/SAP SuccessFactors): Workday and SAP provide broad HR functionality, procurement familiarity, and enterprise controls. Orbio may be considered where organizations prioritize higher automation for high-volume hiring and specialist communication channels.

Market share and adoption trends

No reliable market-share data were found in the reviewed sources. Orbio appears early-stage based on public company and funding signals.

Sources: Official vendor documentation; public competitor product and pricing pages; public company and funding databases; industry review and community discussion pages.

	Orbio AI	Greenhouse	Workday Recruiting
Starting Price	Not publicly disclosed (sales-led)	Published plan structure; price typically requires a quote for larger orgs	Not publicly disclosed (enterprise HCM pricing)
Primary fit	High-volume enterprise hiring with integrated automation and multi-channel outreach (vendor claims)	Recruiting teams seeking structured ATS workflows and a broad integration ecosystem	Large enterprises standardizing on Workday HCM suite
Key strengths	Extensive automation including voice and messaging channels; vendor-stated enterprise security certifications	Mature ATS features, governance, and partner ecosystem	Integrated HCM suite, enterprise controls, global HR operations
Key weaknesses	Limited independent review footprint; pricing not public; potential candidate outreach risks	Not designed as a fully autonomous recruiting agent system; relies on integrations for advanced automation	Can be complex and costly to implement for some hiring teams

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus modern ATS vendors (Greenhouse/Lever): Orbio’s differentiator is the vendor-described multi-agent automation and conversational/voice capabilities. Greenhouse and Lever provide mature ATS and CRM functionality with larger partner ecosystems and more extensive third-party review coverage; achieving similar automation may require additional tools.
Versus suite vendors (Workday/SAP SuccessFactors): Workday and SAP provide broad HR functionality, procurement familiarity, and enterprise controls. Orbio may be considered where organizations prioritize higher automation for high-volume hiring and specialist communication channels.

Market share and adoption trends

No reliable market-share data were found in the reviewed sources. Orbio appears early-stage based on public company and funding signals.

Sources: Official vendor documentation; public competitor product and pricing pages; public company and funding databases; industry review and community discussion pages.

	Orbio AI	Greenhouse	Workday Recruiting
Starting Price	Not publicly disclosed (sales-led)	Published plan structure; price typically requires a quote for larger orgs	Not publicly disclosed (enterprise HCM pricing)
Primary fit	High-volume enterprise hiring with integrated automation and multi-channel outreach (vendor claims)	Recruiting teams seeking structured ATS workflows and a broad integration ecosystem	Large enterprises standardizing on Workday HCM suite
Key strengths	Extensive automation including voice and messaging channels; vendor-stated enterprise security certifications	Mature ATS features, governance, and partner ecosystem	Integrated HCM suite, enterprise controls, global HR operations
Key weaknesses	Limited independent review footprint; pricing not public; potential candidate outreach risks	Not designed as a fully autonomous recruiting agent system; relies on integrations for advanced automation	Can be complex and costly to implement for some hiring teams