Origami

Name: Origami
Brand: Origami

A green energy world, powered by smart technology.

Est 2013|Valuation $116.2M|Raised $81.4M

LinkedIn 8K|Website|FTEs 135|HQ Cambridge, England, GB

MarketsEnergy & Infrastructure Asset Analytics

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Origami and Modo Energy differ in emphasis: Modo focuses on benchmarking, forecasting, and market research, while Origami positions itself around portfolio performance combining physical, financial, and battery analytics. Organizations may combine both types of tools: market outlook and benchmarking from one vendor, and operational/commercial performance management from a telemetry-focused platform such as Origami (if a fit). - ACCURE is more specialized in battery intelligence (safety, degradation, warranty compliance). For requirements centered on thermal event detection, degradation analysis, or warranty tooling, ACCURE may offer deeper telemetry analytics. For independent portfolio-level performance comparisons across RTM providers, Origami's positioning may be closer to that use case.

Adoption trends / market signal

Historical reporting on funding rounds and press coverage indicates investor interest in flexibility and BESS software. However, a registry listing noting an adverse corporate status, if verified, would indicate a negative change in viability. Vendor viability should be a gating diligence item.

	Origami	Modo Energy	ACCURE Battery Intelligence
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (likely enterprise quote)	Not publicly listed (plans shown; pricing via demo)	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote typical)
Best For	Asset owners/operators needing independent physical+financial+BESS analytics and benchmarking	Owners/investors/operators needing BESS market research, benchmarking, and forecasts	Owners/operators needing battery safety & performance analytics and warranty-related visibility
Key Strength	Concept of portfolio performance combining physical and financial analytics; capability claims for benchmarking RTM/providers	Content and market research positioning; explicit platform features listed on public pages	Focus on battery risk, safety, warranty conditions, and detection of issues
Key Weakness	Limited public information on security/compliance, pricing, and customer outcomes; brand-name collisions reduce review visibility	May be more focused on market intelligence than telemetry-driven performance management	More battery-centric; may not cover full commercial/financial portfolio management in the same way

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Origami and Modo Energy differ in emphasis: Modo focuses on benchmarking, forecasting, and market research, while Origami positions itself around portfolio performance combining physical, financial, and battery analytics. Organizations may combine both types of tools: market outlook and benchmarking from one vendor, and operational/commercial performance management from a telemetry-focused platform such as Origami (if a fit).
ACCURE is more specialized in battery intelligence (safety, degradation, warranty compliance). For requirements centered on thermal event detection, degradation analysis, or warranty tooling, ACCURE may offer deeper telemetry analytics. For independent portfolio-level performance comparisons across RTM providers, Origami's positioning may be closer to that use case.

Adoption trends / market signal

	Origami	Modo Energy	ACCURE Battery Intelligence
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (likely enterprise quote)	Not publicly listed (plans shown; pricing via demo)	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote typical)
Best For	Asset owners/operators needing independent physical+financial+BESS analytics and benchmarking	Owners/investors/operators needing BESS market research, benchmarking, and forecasts	Owners/operators needing battery safety & performance analytics and warranty-related visibility
Key Strength	Concept of portfolio performance combining physical and financial analytics; capability claims for benchmarking RTM/providers	Content and market research positioning; explicit platform features listed on public pages	Focus on battery risk, safety, warranty conditions, and detection of issues
Key Weakness	Limited public information on security/compliance, pricing, and customer outcomes; brand-name collisions reduce review visibility	May be more focused on market intelligence than telemetry-driven performance management	More battery-centric; may not cover full commercial/financial portfolio management in the same way