Outbuild

Name: Outbuild
Brand: Outbuild
Rating: 4.9 (24 reviews)

AI Native

Construction scheduling and planning made easy, fast & collaborative

Est 2021|Valuation $12.2M|Raised $17.2M

LinkedIn 17K|Website|Web traffic 35K|FTEs 81|HQ San Francisco, California, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Outbuild versus Primavera P6: The vendor positions Primavera P6 as complex and siloed in many field-adoption contexts. Primavera P6 remains entrenched in projects where contract requirements mandate it, and organizations should evaluate interoperability and export/import needs when considering alternatives. - Outbuild versus Autodesk Build Schedule: The vendor provides an integration to synchronize schedules with Autodesk Build, which is intended to reduce manual uploads. Many teams may retain Autodesk as a distribution or record-keeping layer while authoring or coordinating schedules in other tools. - Outbuild versus Procore schedule workflows: The vendor provides integration to synchronize schedule updates and to link RFIs and submittals into schedule or roadblock context. This may be relevant for organizations that use Procore as a central project management platform but require more collaborative planning workflows.

Market share and adoption trends

No independent analyst report with quantified market share for the vendor was identified in the sources accessed during this research.

	Outbuild	Oracle Primavera P6	Autodesk Construction Cloud (Build) Schedule module
Starting Price	Published subscription pricing available from the vendor (vendor-stated starting price)	Typically quote-based / enterprise licensing	Typically subscription/bundle-based; pricing varies by package
Appropriate Use Case	Field and office collaboration; connecting lookahead/weekly plan to CPM; teams that prefer portfolio-based pricing	Owner-mandated CPM environments; organizations with dedicated schedulers and complex enterprise controls	Teams standardized on the Autodesk ecosystem that require schedule publishing and coordination capabilities
Key Strength	Collaboration and planning workflows; vendor-stated unlimited users/projects pricing model	Industry-standard features for complex CPM requirements	Native presence in Autodesk workflows and integration with document/control features
Key Weakness	Reported integration gaps; potential mobile parity questions; web connectivity constraints	Complexity and steep learning curve; field adoption challenges	May not match dedicated CPM tools for advanced scheduling capabilities

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Outbuild versus Primavera P6: The vendor positions Primavera P6 as complex and siloed in many field-adoption contexts. Primavera P6 remains entrenched in projects where contract requirements mandate it, and organizations should evaluate interoperability and export/import needs when considering alternatives.
Outbuild versus Autodesk Build Schedule: The vendor provides an integration to synchronize schedules with Autodesk Build, which is intended to reduce manual uploads. Many teams may retain Autodesk as a distribution or record-keeping layer while authoring or coordinating schedules in other tools.
Outbuild versus Procore schedule workflows: The vendor provides integration to synchronize schedule updates and to link RFIs and submittals into schedule or roadblock context. This may be relevant for organizations that use Procore as a central project management platform but require more collaborative planning workflows.

Market share and adoption trends

No independent analyst report with quantified market share for the vendor was identified in the sources accessed during this research.

	Outbuild	Oracle Primavera P6	Autodesk Construction Cloud (Build) Schedule module
Starting Price	Published subscription pricing available from the vendor (vendor-stated starting price)	Typically quote-based / enterprise licensing	Typically subscription/bundle-based; pricing varies by package
Appropriate Use Case	Field and office collaboration; connecting lookahead/weekly plan to CPM; teams that prefer portfolio-based pricing	Owner-mandated CPM environments; organizations with dedicated schedulers and complex enterprise controls	Teams standardized on the Autodesk ecosystem that require schedule publishing and coordination capabilities
Key Strength	Collaboration and planning workflows; vendor-stated unlimited users/projects pricing model	Industry-standard features for complex CPM requirements	Native presence in Autodesk workflows and integration with document/control features
Key Weakness	Reported integration gaps; potential mobile parity questions; web connectivity constraints	Complexity and steep learning curve; field adoption challenges	May not match dedicated CPM tools for advanced scheduling capabilities

Outbuild

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market share and adoption trends

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market share and adoption trends

02Market Map