OX Security

Name: OX Security
Brand: OX Security
Rating: 4.8 (80 reviews)

AI Native

VibeSec: Security that vibes the way software is built

Est 2021|Valuation $75M|Raised $102.2M|24 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 41K|Web traffic 45K|FTEs 185|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsApplication Security Testing (AST)Code Security SCA

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | OX Security | Snyk | Aikido Security | |--------|-------------|------|-----------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed (vendor-led sales and trial options) | Public tiers with published starting prices and a free tier | Public pricing page; positioned for smaller teams seeking transparent pricing | | Best For | Organizations needing correlation and prioritization across code-to-runtime and governance for AI-assisted development; teams seeking to reduce AppSec triage backlog | Teams seeking a broad developer-centric platform with published tiering and ecosystem integrations | Smaller teams seeking simpler, price-transparent packaging without enterprise procurement complexity | | Key Strength | Contextualization and tracing findings back to code/runtime; multi-pillar platform addressing code, cloud, and runtime visibility | Clear pricing entry points and extensive developer tooling ecosystem | Simpler packaging and pricing transparency relative to enterprise sales-led tools | | Key Weakness | Pricing opacity and risk of adding an operational layer if the platform does not materially reduce triage effort; limited public visibility into negative reviews in accessible snippets | Can be costly at scale; enterprise pricing details require vendor engagement | May be less suitable for complex enterprise environments requiring deep customization and enterprise-specific controls | - Narrative analysis - Positioning: The vendor publishes materials framing differences vs competing developer-centric vendors, indicating direct competition for budgets where teams evaluate consolidation and prioritization capabilities. - Pricing comparison: Some competitors publish starting prices and tiered plans, enabling quicker self-serve cost estimation for smaller buyers; the vendor reviewed here does not publish clear pricing on public pages reviewed during this research. - Market adoption signals: Fundraising and press coverage suggest investor interest and traction in the AppSec and supply chain security market.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	OX Security	Snyk	Aikido Security
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (vendor-led sales and trial options)	Public tiers with published starting prices and a free tier	Public pricing page; positioned for smaller teams seeking transparent pricing
Best For	Organizations needing correlation and prioritization across code-to-runtime and governance for AI-assisted development; teams seeking to reduce AppSec triage backlog	Teams seeking a broad developer-centric platform with published tiering and ecosystem integrations	Smaller teams seeking simpler, price-transparent packaging without enterprise procurement complexity
Key Strength	Contextualization and tracing findings back to code/runtime; multi-pillar platform addressing code, cloud, and runtime visibility	Clear pricing entry points and extensive developer tooling ecosystem	Simpler packaging and pricing transparency relative to enterprise sales-led tools
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity and risk of adding an operational layer if the platform does not materially reduce triage effort; limited public visibility into negative reviews in accessible snippets	Can be costly at scale; enterprise pricing details require vendor engagement	May be less suitable for complex enterprise environments requiring deep customization and enterprise-specific controls

Narrative analysis
- Positioning: The vendor publishes materials framing differences vs competing developer-centric vendors, indicating direct competition for budgets where teams evaluate consolidation and prioritization capabilities.
- Pricing comparison: Some competitors publish starting prices and tiered plans, enabling quicker self-serve cost estimation for smaller buyers; the vendor reviewed here does not publish clear pricing on public pages reviewed during this research.
- Market adoption signals: Fundraising and press coverage suggest investor interest and traction in the AppSec and supply chain security market.