Passport

Name: Passport
Brand: Passport

Creating the future of Open Banking

LinkedIn 449|Web traffic 4K|FTEs 13|HQ San Francisco, us

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Passport vs Belvo: Belvo provides clearer public pricing and is known for Open Finance data connectivity; Passport emphasizes payments-rail integration and Bre‑B-related documentation. Buyers should map whether the primary need is data aggregation (Belvo strength) or scheme participation/real-time payments enablement (Passport emphasis). - Passport vs Minka: Minka positions itself as core infrastructure and orchestration for high-scale payments; Passport positions itself as an API platform enabling participants and fintechs to build products that integrate with local rails. Depending on system architecture, Passport may be a platform/provider while Minka may be a rail/infrastructure provider; they can be competitors, complements, or occupy different layers.

Adoption trends and market context (Bre‑B)

Bre‑B is Colombia’s instant payments initiative, and the ecosystem is evolving with policy and adoption considerations (for example, taxation and cash-usage dynamics). This context is material because Passport’s market position is tied to Bre‑B participation and related use cases.

	Passport (official vendor site)	Belvo	Minka
Starting Price	Not publicly listed	Vendor-published entry pricing visible	Not publicly listed
Primary focus	Colombia-focused Open Finance and Bre‑B integration; APIs and webhooks for payments	Open Finance data connectivity and related products in LATAM with clearer packaging	National-scale real-time payments infrastructure and orchestration
Publicly documented strengths	Documentation covering Bre‑B QR lifecycle and payment flows; ecosystem participation claims	Transparent entry pricing and developer onboarding path	Infrastructure-level scale and availability claims
Publicly documented weaknesses	Limited public proof: certifications, pricing, user reviews	May not operate as a Bre‑B node; different scope by country/rail	Likely enterprise-only and complex integrations; less self-serve

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Passport vs Belvo: Belvo provides clearer public pricing and is known for Open Finance data connectivity; Passport emphasizes payments-rail integration and Bre‑B-related documentation. Buyers should map whether the primary need is data aggregation (Belvo strength) or scheme participation/real-time payments enablement (Passport emphasis).
Passport vs Minka: Minka positions itself as core infrastructure and orchestration for high-scale payments; Passport positions itself as an API platform enabling participants and fintechs to build products that integrate with local rails. Depending on system architecture, Passport may be a platform/provider while Minka may be a rail/infrastructure provider; they can be competitors, complements, or occupy different layers.

Adoption trends and market context (Bre‑B)

	Passport (official vendor site)	Belvo	Minka
Starting Price	Not publicly listed	Vendor-published entry pricing visible	Not publicly listed
Primary focus	Colombia-focused Open Finance and Bre‑B integration; APIs and webhooks for payments	Open Finance data connectivity and related products in LATAM with clearer packaging	National-scale real-time payments infrastructure and orchestration
Publicly documented strengths	Documentation covering Bre‑B QR lifecycle and payment flows; ecosystem participation claims	Transparent entry pricing and developer onboarding path	Infrastructure-level scale and availability claims
Publicly documented weaknesses	Limited public proof: certifications, pricing, user reviews	May not operate as a Bre‑B node; different scope by country/rail	Likely enterprise-only and complex integrations; less self-serve

Passport

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Adoption trends and market context (Bre‑B)

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Adoption trends and market context (Bre‑B)

02Market Map