Paycom Retention Dashboard

Name: Paycom Retention Dashboard
Brand: Paycom

Leader

Our truly single HR and payroll software automates the routine to simplify life for employees and transform businesses.

Est 1998|Valuation $11.4B|Raised $3.6B

LinkedIn 231K|Website|Web traffic 2.2M|FTEs 5,770|HQ Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, US

MarketsHR Analytics & Workforce Planning

01Competitive Landscape

Shortlist competitors most likely to be compared

For mid-market buyers considering an integrated HCM and payroll suite:

Paylocity
UKG (Ready/Pro)
ADP Workforce Now

For larger enterprises:

Workday

Narrative competitive analysis

- Paylocity: Some competitor materials and customer commentary indicate selection over Paycom was influenced by perceived balance among functionality, user experience, and support. This suggests Paycom can lose deals on user experience and support perception despite comparable feature breadth. - UKG: Frequently considered by organizations evaluating Paycom; UKG is often associated with workforce management strengths. Both vendors have mixed reviews in different areas. - Workday: Typically positioned for larger, more complex enterprises where buyers accept higher implementation effort and cost for enterprise-scale capabilities. Public pricing benchmarks found online are inconsistent and should be treated as negotiation anecdotes rather than authoritative.

Market adoption and analyst signals

Analyst review platforms list Paycom among cloud HCM suites for smaller enterprise segments with a visible sample of ratings. These listings indicate buyer evaluation activity but do not provide direct evidence of the Retention Dashboard’s performance.
Survey and analyst materials referencing vendor adoption are directional and should be used alongside primary vetting in procurement.

	Paycom Retention Dashboard (within Paycom)	Paylocity	UKG (Ready/Pro)
Starting Price	Vendor indicates the Retention Dashboard is included for Paycom clients (published suite pricing not available)	Published pricing not available; vendor requires contact	Published pricing not available; vendor requires contact (tiering and procurement documents vary)
Best For	Organizations already standardizing on Paycom that want built-in retention risk views	Mid-market HR/payroll buyers evaluating user experience and community features	Organizations with strong workforce management and scheduling needs
Key Strength	Uses existing HR/payroll data within the vendor’s system of record; automatic score updates from internal data sources	Established market presence; frequently shortlisted	Workforce management depth and scheduling capabilities
Key Weakness	Predictive model details and validation are not publicly disclosed; some reported variability in reporting and support	Pricing transparency and module depth vary by contract	Implementation complexity and variable pricing/packaging