Paycom Time-Off Requests

Name: Paycom Time-Off Requests
Brand: Paycom
Rating: 4.3 (4427 reviews)

Leader

Our truly single HR and payroll software automates the routine to simplify life for employees and transform businesses.

Est 1998|Valuation $11.4B|Raised $3.6B

LinkedIn 231K|Website|Web traffic 2.2M|FTEs 5,770|HQ Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, US

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Paycom vs UKG: UKG’s workforce-management heritage is reflected in request management constructs and manager queue features; Paycom emphasizes integrated posting into payroll and rules-based automation.
Paycom vs Rippling: Rippling emphasizes integration breadth and cross-domain automation; Paycom emphasizes suite depth and a single-data-source approach, which some buyers perceive as more constrained in third-party integration scenarios.
Paycom vs Paylocity: Paylocity competes in the midmarket with a focus on user experience and support balance; competitive claims and customer testimonials should be validated independently.

- Paycom vs UKG: UKG’s workforce-management heritage is reflected in request management constructs and manager queue features; Paycom emphasizes integrated posting into payroll and rules-based automation. - Paycom vs Rippling: Rippling emphasizes integration breadth and cross-domain automation; Paycom emphasizes suite depth and a single-data-source approach, which some buyers perceive as more constrained in third-party integration scenarios. - Paycom vs Paylocity: Paylocity competes in the midmarket with a focus on user experience and support balance; competitive claims and customer testimonials should be validated independently.

	Paycom Time-Off Requests	UKG Ready (Time Off Requests)	Rippling (Time Off / Time & Attendance)
Starting Price	Published pricing is quote-based from the vendor (module pricing varies; not publicly listed)	Published pricing is quote-based from the vendor (varies by edition/partner)	Published pricing is quote-based for larger accounts; public pricing varies by bundle
Best For	Organizations seeking integrated payroll-to-timecard-to-accrual workflows with configurable automation rules	Organizations prioritizing workforce management and request queue constructs	Organizations that prioritize broad integrations and cross-domain automation across HR, IT, and finance
Key Strength	Rules-based automation for approvals; integrated posting to payroll/timecard/accruals; mobile approvals	Workforce management depth, request queue and manager approval constructs	Integration breadth and automated cross-domain workflows (integration claims should be validated in a POC)
Key Weakness	Community reports of accrual/balance issues, add-on costs, and perceived integration limits	End-user experience can vary by configuration; complex setups can lead to request blocking	Users report occasional dissatisfaction; payroll/leave edge cases may require detailed validation