Pequity

Name: Pequity
Brand: Pequity
Rating: 4.7 (3 reviews)

Price roles, run comp cycles, manage pay bands, streamline approvals, and promote pay transparency - all in one platform

Est 2019|Valuation $60M|Raised $19M|21 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Web traffic 1K|FTEs 27|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsPayroll & Compensation Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Pequity appears strongest: - Flexibility with governance: Vendor materials and case study describe complex logic handling and permissioning intended to replace multi-sheet planner sprawl. - ATS-embedded workflows: A Chrome extension combined with a Greenhouse integration suggests an approach that brings compensation context into recruiting workflows. Where alternatives may be stronger: - Pricing transparency and self-serve evaluation: Competitors publish clearer entry points or modular pricing, which can facilitate self-serve evaluation. - Independent review depth: Competitors generally show larger volumes of independent reviews, providing more observable user sentiment. - Reporting/analytics maturity: Reporting has been identified as an area for improvement in independent reviews; larger competitors may offer more mature reporting and export options. Adoption signal: - The vendor’s acquisition by a large HCM provider is a strategic event that suggests enterprise relevance. Buyers should assess any changes in packaging, integration, or support models that may follow.

	Pequity	Pave	ChartHop
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom quote)	Free entry tier for small teams; other packages are sales-led	Public pricing information includes per-employee-per-month (PEPM) references and minimums; implementation fees may apply
Best For	Mid-market/enterprise teams needing configurable comp cycles, ranges, and embedded ATS offer workflows	Organizations seeking market benchmarking and planning, with a clear free entry point for small teams	Organizations seeking a broader people platform with modular comp-review capabilities
Key Strength	Configurability and structured workflows that replace spreadsheet planners; documented ATS integration approach	Market data and benchmarking with a clear entry point for small teams	Transparent modular pricing and broader people analytics capabilities
Key Weakness	Limited independent review volume; reporting and admin self-service limitations cited; pricing opacity	Sales-led model for full platform adoption; may not be focused exclusively on comp cycle workflows in isolation	Implementation fees and minimums can increase TCO; comp functionality is one part of a larger platform

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Pequity appears strongest:

Flexibility with governance: Vendor materials and case study describe complex logic handling and permissioning intended to replace multi-sheet planner sprawl.
ATS-embedded workflows: A Chrome extension combined with a Greenhouse integration suggests an approach that brings compensation context into recruiting workflows.

Where alternatives may be stronger:

Pricing transparency and self-serve evaluation: Competitors publish clearer entry points or modular pricing, which can facilitate self-serve evaluation.
Independent review depth: Competitors generally show larger volumes of independent reviews, providing more observable user sentiment.
Reporting/analytics maturity: Reporting has been identified as an area for improvement in independent reviews; larger competitors may offer more mature reporting and export options.

Adoption signal:

The vendor’s acquisition by a large HCM provider is a strategic event that suggests enterprise relevance. Buyers should assess any changes in packaging, integration, or support models that may follow.

	Pequity	Pave	ChartHop
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom quote)	Free entry tier for small teams; other packages are sales-led	Public pricing information includes per-employee-per-month (PEPM) references and minimums; implementation fees may apply
Best For	Mid-market/enterprise teams needing configurable comp cycles, ranges, and embedded ATS offer workflows	Organizations seeking market benchmarking and planning, with a clear free entry point for small teams	Organizations seeking a broader people platform with modular comp-review capabilities
Key Strength	Configurability and structured workflows that replace spreadsheet planners; documented ATS integration approach	Market data and benchmarking with a clear entry point for small teams	Transparent modular pricing and broader people analytics capabilities
Key Weakness	Limited independent review volume; reporting and admin self-service limitations cited; pricing opacity	Sales-led model for full platform adoption; may not be focused exclusively on comp cycle workflows in isolation	Implementation fees and minimums can increase TCO; comp functionality is one part of a larger platform