Per Angusta

Name: Per Angusta
Brand: SpendHQ
Rating: 4.7 (3 reviews)

The Power of Connecting Spend Intelligence with Procurement Performance Management

Est 2012|Raised $75M|34 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Website|Web traffic 6K|FTEs 134|HQ Atlanta, Georgia, US

MarketsProcurement Analytics

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Per Angusta (as part of SpendHQ) typically competes with spend analytics-first vendors on the depth of analytics and with S2P suites on end-to-end transactional coverage. PPM-first platforms commonly emphasize project/value governance and reporting; analytics-first platforms emphasize data engineering, enrichment, and predictive capabilities.
Suites such as Coupa, SAP Ariba, and Ivalua are more likely to be selected when organizations prefer fewer vendors and end-to-end transactional execution. PPM point solutions are more likely to be selected when an organization already has S2P systems but lacks a dedicated layer for performance/value tracking and executive reporting.

- Per Angusta (as part of SpendHQ) typically competes with spend analytics-first vendors on the depth of analytics and with S2P suites on end-to-end transactional coverage. PPM-first platforms commonly emphasize project/value governance and reporting; analytics-first platforms emphasize data engineering, enrichment, and predictive capabilities. - Suites such as Coupa, SAP Ariba, and Ivalua are more likely to be selected when organizations prefer fewer vendors and end-to-end transactional execution. PPM point solutions are more likely to be selected when an organization already has S2P systems but lacks a dedicated layer for performance/value tracking and executive reporting.

Adoption trends

The consolidation of PPM functionality into broader spend intelligence platforms aligns with a broader trend toward combining spend intelligence with performance/value management.

	Per Angusta (PPM; now under SpendHQ brand)	Sievo	Coupa Spend Analysis / Suite
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Not publicly listed (quote-based)
Typical Use Case	Teams needing structured initiative pipeline, savings/value tracking, and stakeholder reporting	Organizations prioritizing data enrichment, analytics depth, and benchmarking	Organizations seeking broad suite capabilities, community intelligence, and integrated transactional workflows
Key Strength	Focus on procurement initiative governance and value tracking	Emphasis on data engineering, enrichment, and analytics depth	Broad S2P ecosystem and integrated workflows
Key Weakness	Sparse public reviews; captured feedback noted integration-related performance issues; limited public security documentation	Requires diligence to validate vendor claims; may be heavier in terms of analytics program requirements	Can be complex and resource-intensive to implement; suite cost and scope can be high