Perygee

Name: Perygee
Brand: Perygee

AI Native

The Enterprise App Builder

Est 2021

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 6|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsWorkflow Automation

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- If the vendor’s product delivers on its stated goal of enabling internal applications and integrations with shorter deployment timelines, it competes with both iPaaS tools and internal tool platforms (Retool-like products). - Zapier and Make excel in breadth of prebuilt SaaS integrations and ease of use for smaller teams; enterprise buyers may encounter governance and cost limits at scale. - Workato and Tray.io are often stronger for deep enterprise-grade integrations but may require larger implementation effort and cost.

Market share/adoption

No authoritative market share or customer-count figures were identified for Perygee/OverAI in the accessible sources.

	Perygee / OverAI	Zapier	Make (Make.com)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; demo-led sales model	Published team-plan pricing available from the vendor	Public pricing exists; credit-based tiers (exact tiers vary by plan and region)
Typical Fit	Mid-market/enterprise teams seeking combined integration, automation, and internal-app capabilities (based on vendor positioning)	SMB and mid-market teams needing quick SaaS automations with many prebuilt integrations	Teams seeking flexible automation scenarios with credit-based metering and transformation capabilities
Key Strength (vendor materials)	Vendor materials describe combined integrations, automations, and internal workflows in a single product; emphasis on faster deployment (vendor-claimed)	Large integration ecosystem and ease of use for common SaaS tasks	Visual scenario builder and flexible transformation logic; often more advanced than basic trigger-action tools
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews and limited publicly available pricing/security documentation; evidence of repositioning which may affect continuity	Task-based pricing can become expensive at scale; governance for large organizations can be limited on lower tiers	Credit/operation metering can be confusing; governance and enterprise controls depend on plan

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

If the vendor’s product delivers on its stated goal of enabling internal applications and integrations with shorter deployment timelines, it competes with both iPaaS tools and internal tool platforms (Retool-like products).
Zapier and Make excel in breadth of prebuilt SaaS integrations and ease of use for smaller teams; enterprise buyers may encounter governance and cost limits at scale.
Workato and Tray.io are often stronger for deep enterprise-grade integrations but may require larger implementation effort and cost.

Market share/adoption

No authoritative market share or customer-count figures were identified for Perygee/OverAI in the accessible sources.

	Perygee / OverAI	Zapier	Make (Make.com)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; demo-led sales model	Published team-plan pricing available from the vendor	Public pricing exists; credit-based tiers (exact tiers vary by plan and region)
Typical Fit	Mid-market/enterprise teams seeking combined integration, automation, and internal-app capabilities (based on vendor positioning)	SMB and mid-market teams needing quick SaaS automations with many prebuilt integrations	Teams seeking flexible automation scenarios with credit-based metering and transformation capabilities
Key Strength (vendor materials)	Vendor materials describe combined integrations, automations, and internal workflows in a single product; emphasis on faster deployment (vendor-claimed)	Large integration ecosystem and ease of use for common SaaS tasks	Visual scenario builder and flexible transformation logic; often more advanced than basic trigger-action tools
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews and limited publicly available pricing/security documentation; evidence of repositioning which may affect continuity	Task-based pricing can become expensive at scale; governance for large organizations can be limited on lower tiers	Credit/operation metering can be confusing; governance and enterprise controls depend on plan