Petscreening
Pet Screening and Assistance Animal Validation
Est 2017|Valuation $337M|Raised $84.8M
MarketsProperty Management
Pet Screening and Assistance Animal Validation
Published Sep 19, 2026
Direct head-to-head vendor comparisons in public reviews are limited. Some operators report maintaining both an in-application verification tool and a vendor solution to handle pet additions mid-lease.
The vendor publishes a large footprint and lists multifamily clients in marketing materials. Independent market share estimates were not found in the public analyst reports reviewed.
| Starting Price | Published pricing varies by role; some materials indicate housing providers may not be directly charged while applicant-facing pet profiles can include fees referenced in support documentation | Pricing not fully public; applicant-facing workflows commonly include a per-pet fee; property managers may be able to add without additional vendor charge | Pricing not fully visible in reviewed materials; positions itself as an ESA verification service with distinct billing arrangements |
| Best For | Mid-market to large property managers seeking standardized pet profiles, FIDO risk scoring, and outsourced assistance animal review | Teams seeking an embedded verification experience to minimize redirects | Housing providers focused primarily on assistance animal verification and HUD-aligned workflows |
| Key Strength | PMS partnerships and a wide integration footprint; vendor has publicly completed a recent security/compliance audit | Embedded workflow approach that minimizes redirection | Focused messaging on ESA/HUD compliance |
| Key Weakness | Tenant dissatisfaction risk related to third-party portal use and applicant-facing fees; public complaints about privacy and assistance-animal friction | Less public evidence of the same market footprint reported by larger vendors | Less visible integration ecosystem and lower public evidence of large-scale adoption |