Ping Identity PingOne

Name: Ping Identity PingOne
Brand: Ping Identity
Rating: 4.4 (797 reviews)

Leader

Identity Security for the Global Enterprise

Est 2002|Valuation $1.9B|Raised $54.6M

LinkedIn 170K|Website|Web traffic 2.7M|FTEs 2,311|HQ Denver, CO

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & SSO Identity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)

Platform CoversFraud Detection

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where PingOne tends to provide value - Federation-heavy enterprise IAM requirements and hybrid deployments. - Organizations standardizing on Ping’s suite of identity capabilities. Where competitors often win - Okta: frequently perceived as faster to deploy across a large set of SaaS apps due to its integration network, and often rates favorably on API and integration capabilities in user feedback. - Microsoft Entra ID: often preferred in Microsoft-centric environments because identity features are bundled or otherwise influenced by broader Microsoft agreements. Adoption trends / market presence - Industry review grids and analyst aggregations have classified Ping Identity favorably in SSO-related evaluations. Major peer-review platforms show a substantial number of reviews and generally favorable scores for the Ping Identity Platform (note: platform-level coverage may include multiple Ping products).

	Ping Identity PingOne	Okta (Workforce + Customer Identity)	Microsoft Entra ID
Starting Price	Often quote-based; marketplace listings show published package pricing examples rather than simple per-seat published rates	Vendor-published starting points are provided in some materials and marketing collateral	Per-user pricing is published by Microsoft with licensing/commitment terms that affect final cost
Typical Use Case	Enterprises needing standards-based federation, hybrid patterns, and multi-capability identity platform options	Organizations requiring a broad SaaS integration catalog and streamlined admin experience; strong ecosystem	Microsoft-centric environments; tight integration with Microsoft 365/Azure and licensing leverage
Key Strength	Federation at scale and integrated identity capabilities (MFA, orchestration, verification, privileged access add-ons)	Large integration catalog and a polished SaaS administration experience	Cost and integration advantages for organizations already licensed for Microsoft services
Key Weakness	Can involve multiple administrative consoles and components; pricing transparency varies	Perceived cost at scale and separate CIAM pricing for some products	Licensing and external identity pricing can be complex; bundle-based economics influence total cost

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where PingOne tends to provide value

Federation-heavy enterprise IAM requirements and hybrid deployments.
Organizations standardizing on Ping’s suite of identity capabilities.

Where competitors often win

Okta: frequently perceived as faster to deploy across a large set of SaaS apps due to its integration network, and often rates favorably on API and integration capabilities in user feedback.
Microsoft Entra ID: often preferred in Microsoft-centric environments because identity features are bundled or otherwise influenced by broader Microsoft agreements.

Adoption trends / market presence

Industry review grids and analyst aggregations have classified Ping Identity favorably in SSO-related evaluations. Major peer-review platforms show a substantial number of reviews and generally favorable scores for the Ping Identity Platform (note: platform-level coverage may include multiple Ping products).

	Ping Identity PingOne	Okta (Workforce + Customer Identity)	Microsoft Entra ID
Starting Price	Often quote-based; marketplace listings show published package pricing examples rather than simple per-seat published rates	Vendor-published starting points are provided in some materials and marketing collateral	Per-user pricing is published by Microsoft with licensing/commitment terms that affect final cost
Typical Use Case	Enterprises needing standards-based federation, hybrid patterns, and multi-capability identity platform options	Organizations requiring a broad SaaS integration catalog and streamlined admin experience; strong ecosystem	Microsoft-centric environments; tight integration with Microsoft 365/Azure and licensing leverage
Key Strength	Federation at scale and integrated identity capabilities (MFA, orchestration, verification, privileged access add-ons)	Large integration catalog and a polished SaaS administration experience	Cost and integration advantages for organizations already licensed for Microsoft services
Key Weakness	Can involve multiple administrative consoles and components; pricing transparency varies	Perceived cost at scale and separate CIAM pricing for some products	Licensing and external identity pricing can be complex; bundle-based economics influence total cost