PinMeTo

Name: PinMeTo
Brand: Pewna norweska sieć kawiarni
Rating: 4.7 (31 reviews)

Marketing technology for multi-location brands.

Est 2013|Valuation $8.2M|Raised $11.6M|42 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 19K|FTEs 103|HQ Malmo, Skåne County, SE

MarketsReview Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

PinMeTo vs Yext - Available review comparisons indicate PinMeTo is often rated higher on ease of use and support quality within the limited review sample, while Yext may be preferred for roadmap breadth and integrations in other review segments. PinMeTo vs Uberall - Review summaries suggest PinMeTo is perceived as easier to use or administer, while Uberall is often noted for product direction and modularity. Buyers should validate claims on a feature-by-feature basis aligned to required publishers and regional coverage. Where alternatives may excel - For very broad directory coverage, large marketplace integrations, or standardized "knowledge graph" concepts, some buyers select Yext, particularly in North America. - For deep social customer care and community management beyond reviews, suites such as SOCi or Birdeye are commonly considered (topic differentiation consistent with category norms, though not exhaustively validated in this source set).

	PinMeTo	Yext	Uberall
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom packages)	Public pricing varies by source; often requires sales contact; third-party pages cite approximate ranges	Pricing page describes packaged plans but generally requires contact for exact costs
Typical Use Case	Multi-location organizations requiring centralized listings, reviews, posts, and EU-oriented security posture	Organizations needing broad digital knowledge management, large ecosystem integrations, and mature integrations	Multi-location organizations seeking packaged modules (listings/reviews/social) and modular add-ons
Key Strengths	Positive review signals for support quality; multi-location workflows; documented ISO 27001 certification	Market presence, breadth of integrations, and larger review volume	Modular packaging and suite positioning; vendor claims of SOC 2 Type II for some offerings
Key Weaknesses	Modest review footprint relative to larger incumbents; some social/inbox coverage gaps; pricing opacity	Reported concerns about cost and complexity in some market commentary	Pricing opacity and some reported reporting issues on review platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

PinMeTo vs Yext

Available review comparisons indicate PinMeTo is often rated higher on ease of use and support quality within the limited review sample, while Yext may be preferred for roadmap breadth and integrations in other review segments.

PinMeTo vs Uberall

Review summaries suggest PinMeTo is perceived as easier to use or administer, while Uberall is often noted for product direction and modularity. Buyers should validate claims on a feature-by-feature basis aligned to required publishers and regional coverage.

Where alternatives may excel

For very broad directory coverage, large marketplace integrations, or standardized "knowledge graph" concepts, some buyers select Yext, particularly in North America.
For deep social customer care and community management beyond reviews, suites such as SOCi or Birdeye are commonly considered (topic differentiation consistent with category norms, though not exhaustively validated in this source set).

	PinMeTo	Yext	Uberall
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom packages)	Public pricing varies by source; often requires sales contact; third-party pages cite approximate ranges	Pricing page describes packaged plans but generally requires contact for exact costs
Typical Use Case	Multi-location organizations requiring centralized listings, reviews, posts, and EU-oriented security posture	Organizations needing broad digital knowledge management, large ecosystem integrations, and mature integrations	Multi-location organizations seeking packaged modules (listings/reviews/social) and modular add-ons
Key Strengths	Positive review signals for support quality; multi-location workflows; documented ISO 27001 certification	Market presence, breadth of integrations, and larger review volume	Modular packaging and suite positioning; vendor claims of SOC 2 Type II for some offerings
Key Weaknesses	Modest review footprint relative to larger incumbents; some social/inbox coverage gaps; pricing opacity	Reported concerns about cost and complexity in some market commentary	Pricing opacity and some reported reporting issues on review platforms