Pistachio

Name: Pistachio
Brand: Pistachios
Rating: 4.8 (24 reviews)

Empowering digital freedom of movement

Valuation $27.8M|Raised $15.3M|1 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 14K|FTEs 125|HQ Oslo, Oslo, NO

MarketsSecurity Awareness & Training

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Pistachio vs KnowBe4/Hoxhunt/Proofpoint SAT: Pistachio differentiates on integrated delivery and reduced administrative overhead. Competitors commonly provide deeper content libraries, more extensive campaign design options, and more mature reporting/compliance tooling. - Pistachio Presence vs Microsoft Purview IRM / Teramind: Presence is presented as less monitoring-focused and aims to reduce alert volume, while Microsoft Purview IRM is a policy-driven insider risk system with strong compliance integrations, and Teramind emphasizes explicit employee activity monitoring which can have cultural or legal implications in some jurisdictions.

Pricing comparison notes

KnowBe4 publishes pricing tables by seat bands and product tiers.
Microsoft Purview IRM licensing can be complex; suite licensing, add-on components, and consumption-based models exist and professional services/implementation can add cost.
Pistachio pricing remains opaque until trial/sync and vendor engagement, which may slow initial evaluation and budgeting.

	Pistachio	KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training	Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; quote/annual	Published per-user pricing tiers and channel pricing for seat bands	Per-user / suite licensing; enterprise suite packaging and licensing options
Best For	Microsoft-centric organizations seeking low-administration SAT with an optional insider risk layer	Organizations seeking an extensive content library, tiered features, and broad ecosystem integrations	M365-heavy enterprises requiring policy-driven insider risk and compliance integration
Key Strength	Automated delivery within existing workflows; Entra integration	Mature platform with extensive content and campaign design features	Deep integration with Microsoft compliance and security ecosystem
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; reported customization/reporting limitations; SOC 2 not claimed	Can require more administrative effort and portal management depending on configuration	Can be complex to configure and govern; licensing and consumption can be confusing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Pistachio vs KnowBe4/Hoxhunt/Proofpoint SAT: Pistachio differentiates on integrated delivery and reduced administrative overhead. Competitors commonly provide deeper content libraries, more extensive campaign design options, and more mature reporting/compliance tooling.
Pistachio Presence vs Microsoft Purview IRM / Teramind: Presence is presented as less monitoring-focused and aims to reduce alert volume, while Microsoft Purview IRM is a policy-driven insider risk system with strong compliance integrations, and Teramind emphasizes explicit employee activity monitoring which can have cultural or legal implications in some jurisdictions.

Pricing comparison notes

KnowBe4 publishes pricing tables by seat bands and product tiers.
Microsoft Purview IRM licensing can be complex; suite licensing, add-on components, and consumption-based models exist and professional services/implementation can add cost.
Pistachio pricing remains opaque until trial/sync and vendor engagement, which may slow initial evaluation and budgeting.

	Pistachio	KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training	Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; quote/annual	Published per-user pricing tiers and channel pricing for seat bands	Per-user / suite licensing; enterprise suite packaging and licensing options
Best For	Microsoft-centric organizations seeking low-administration SAT with an optional insider risk layer	Organizations seeking an extensive content library, tiered features, and broad ecosystem integrations	M365-heavy enterprises requiring policy-driven insider risk and compliance integration
Key Strength	Automated delivery within existing workflows; Entra integration	Mature platform with extensive content and campaign design features	Deep integration with Microsoft compliance and security ecosystem
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; reported customization/reporting limitations; SOC 2 not claimed	Can require more administrative effort and portal management depending on configuration	Can be complex to configure and govern; licensing and consumption can be confusing