Placed

Name: Placed
Brand: Placed

Hire smarter, faster and at scale, without compromising on quality

Est 2015|Valuation $9.2M|Raised $11M|6 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 162K|FTEs 16|HQ London, England, GB

MarketsApplicant Tracking Systems (ATS)Sourcing & Recruitment Marketing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Placed combines attraction, automated matching, and light ATS-like workflows. Recruitee offers a classic ATS with standard enterprise features (SSO, audit trails, clearer pricing). Placed may be complementary to a primary ATS rather than a drop-in replacement when an organisation requires a system of record.
Against hospitality-first platforms such as Harri, Placed targets service-industry hiring but may favor candidate-side simplicity and brand storytelling; Harri focuses on end-to-end operational hiring and workforce management.
Buyers should validate whether Placed acts primarily as:
1. a sourcing/attraction channel (similar to programmatic job ads),
2. a marketplace, or
3. an ATS replacement.

- Placed combines attraction, automated matching, and light ATS-like workflows. Recruitee offers a classic ATS with standard enterprise features (SSO, audit trails, clearer pricing). Placed may be complementary to a primary ATS rather than a drop-in replacement when an organisation requires a system of record. - Against hospitality-first platforms such as Harri, Placed targets service-industry hiring but may favor candidate-side simplicity and brand storytelling; Harri focuses on end-to-end operational hiring and workforce management. - Buyers should validate whether Placed acts primarily as: 1) a sourcing/attraction channel (similar to programmatic job ads), 2) a marketplace, or 3) an ATS replacement.

	Placed (placed-app.com)	Recruitee (recruitee.com)	Harri (harri.com)
Starting Price	Not publicly disclosed (pricing is gated; fees shown at registration / via sales)	Starts at hundreds per month (Start plan)	Not consistently publicly disclosed (often quote-based)
Best For	UK service-sector employers seeking a mobile-focused matching product and employer branding features	SMB/mid-market teams wanting a collaborative ATS with transparent tiers and many integrations	Hospitality/service operators needing a purpose-built ATS and onboarding stack
Key Strength	Candidate-focused application flow and matching positioning; mobile-centric UX	Transparent pricing, ATS fundamentals, broad integrations	Vertical specialization in hospitality/hourly workflows
Key Weakness	Limited public security and pricing transparency; candidate-facing model emphasizes matching over manual search	More ATS-centric than demand generation channels	Some market feedback highlights application-flow UX considerations; vendor selection should validate operational details