Planning Hub
AI NativeAI powered planning insights for property development
Est 2023|Valuation $5.1M|Raised $530K
AI powered planning insights for property development
Published Jun 25, 2026
| Starting Price | Not publicly listed (demo-led) | Published entry-tier pricing available from the vendor | Free tier mentioned; paid-tier pricing available from the vendor |
| Primary use-case focus | Planning-application oriented insights and planning-context reports | Land sourcing, mapping and pipeline management | Rapid feasibility and constraint-overview reports |
| Key Strength | Positioned for planning application workflows and public-sector engagement | Transparent pricing; map-based sourcing and filter workflows | Fast feasibility outputs; simple user experience |
| Key Weakness | Limited public pricing; limited independent review coverage; security certifications not publicly documented | May focus more on land sourcing than LPA workflows | Narrower scope; may not support detailed application drafting |
—
PlanningHub appears positioned toward planning application workflows and Local Planning Authorities, while competitors such as LandHunt emphasise land sourcing and pipeline management for developers and agents. Glenigan operates primarily as construction/project intelligence and has arrangements for early access to planning applications via partnerships; its commercial model is quote-based. Idox operates as a system-of-record for local authorities; PlanningHub functions as an intelligence layer rather than a replacement for back-office case management.
Many councils are unlikely to replace back-office systems quickly; PlanningHub is likely to be evaluated and piloted as an adjunct intelligence service rather than a direct replacement in the short term.