Planview Portfolios Planning Package

Name: Planview Portfolios Planning Package
Brand: Planview
Rating: 4.3 (502 reviews)

Leader

Building the digital future of connected work.

Est 1989|Valuation $1.8B|Raised $3.1B

LinkedIn 97K|Website|Web traffic 223K|FTEs 1,300|HQ Austin, Texas, US

MarketsProduction Planning Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)

Planview Portfolios Planning Package screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Planview versus Broadcom Clarity: - Some reviewer comparisons suggest Planview Portfolios is perceived as easier to use or administer in certain contexts, while Clarity is chosen for broad enterprise fit and deep configuration in other contexts. Both products are generally positioned as enterprise-level PPM platforms. Planview versus ServiceNow SPM: - ServiceNow SPM is typically negotiated with custom licensing and is often attractive where enterprises already standardize on the Now Platform. Licensing and total cost considerations can be significant for ServiceNow as well, creating similar procurement complexity for enterprise PPM suites. Planview versus Meisterplan (specialist alternative): - Specialist tools such as Meisterplan are cited by some users as alternatives that provide streamlined capacity and scenario planning with lower administrative overhead compared with full enterprise PPM suites.

Adoption and market indicators

Engagement and mindshare metrics from review sites provide directional interest levels but are not audited market share figures.

	Planview Portfolios Planning Package	Broadcom Clarity	ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)
Starting Price	Quote-based; Planning Package tiers exist but published public pricing is not provided	Quote-based; published pricing is typically not publicly listed	Quote-based; custom quotes are typical
Best For	Enterprise PMOs needing portfolio governance, scenario planning, capacity planning, portfolio reporting	Enterprises with mature PPM governance and deep configuration needs	Organizations standardized on ServiceNow wanting portfolio, demand, and execution on the Now Platform
Key Strength	Emphasis on portfolio planning, packaged onboarding offer, reporting and governance capabilities	Broad PPM breadth and a mature ecosystem	Platform extensibility across workflows and integration with IT/ops processes
Key Weakness	User interface and learning curve concerns; potentially heavyweight for smaller organizations; limited pricing transparency	Perceived complexity and cost for some customers; variable vendor relationship perceptions	Licensing complexity and implementation effort can be substantial

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Planview versus Broadcom Clarity:

Some reviewer comparisons suggest Planview Portfolios is perceived as easier to use or administer in certain contexts, while Clarity is chosen for broad enterprise fit and deep configuration in other contexts. Both products are generally positioned as enterprise-level PPM platforms.

Planview versus ServiceNow SPM:

ServiceNow SPM is typically negotiated with custom licensing and is often attractive where enterprises already standardize on the Now Platform. Licensing and total cost considerations can be significant for ServiceNow as well, creating similar procurement complexity for enterprise PPM suites.

Planview versus Meisterplan (specialist alternative):

Specialist tools such as Meisterplan are cited by some users as alternatives that provide streamlined capacity and scenario planning with lower administrative overhead compared with full enterprise PPM suites.

Adoption and market indicators

Engagement and mindshare metrics from review sites provide directional interest levels but are not audited market share figures.

	Planview Portfolios Planning Package	Broadcom Clarity	ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)
Starting Price	Quote-based; Planning Package tiers exist but published public pricing is not provided	Quote-based; published pricing is typically not publicly listed	Quote-based; custom quotes are typical
Best For	Enterprise PMOs needing portfolio governance, scenario planning, capacity planning, portfolio reporting	Enterprises with mature PPM governance and deep configuration needs	Organizations standardized on ServiceNow wanting portfolio, demand, and execution on the Now Platform
Key Strength	Emphasis on portfolio planning, packaged onboarding offer, reporting and governance capabilities	Broad PPM breadth and a mature ecosystem	Platform extensibility across workflows and integration with IT/ops processes
Key Weakness	User interface and learning curve concerns; potentially heavyweight for smaller organizations; limited pricing transparency	Perceived complexity and cost for some customers; variable vendor relationship perceptions	Licensing complexity and implementation effort can be substantial