PointData

Name: PointData
Brand: PointData

We are Australia’s leading property development data and analytics engine. Our data provide insights into the true value

Est 2014|Raised $14.4M|9 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Web traffic 1K|FTEs 12|HQ Adelaide, South Australia, AU

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- PointData vs CoreLogic/Cotality: - PointData is more specialized in evaluating development potential and economic viability rather than primarily reporting historical sales and standardized valuations. - CoreLogic is stronger for enterprises needing broad, standardized property datasets, established compliance processes, and mature valuation workflows. - PointData vs Landchecker: - Landchecker is positioned as a self-serve planning/property intelligence platform with explicit tiered plans and enterprise features (e.g., SAML SSO). - PointData’s relative advantage is the emphasis on ML models and development feasibility/land economics outputs; these claims should be validated against local planning rules and through sample outputs. - PointData vs PropTrack: - PropTrack provides API access linked to a major portal ecosystem and is strong in listings and market dynamics. - PointData focuses on planning feasibility, climate risk layers, and development potential analytics.

Adoption trends / market share

No reliable public market share numbers were identified for PointData; adoption evidence is primarily vendor marketing materials, case studies, LinkedIn presence, and described partnerships.

	PointData	CoreLogic / Cotality (AU)	Landchecker
Starting Price	Valeri Premium: low-cost monthly subscription (other offerings: quote-based)	Not publicly standardized (typically enterprise quote-based)	Free Starter (paid tiers; Enterprise is quote-based)
Best For	Development feasibility screening, planning algorithms, land economics modelling, micro-granular indices	Broad property data, valuation workflows, large-scale enterprise	Planning/property reporting, mapping layers, self-serve workflows; teams wanting explicit enterprise features
Key Strength	Combination of planning, valuation, and land economics modelling; API + bespoke packs; development-specific modelling focus	Breadth of datasets and established enterprise relationships; mature valuation ecosystems	Clear plan tiers; strong self-serve UX in many workflows; Enterprise mentions SAML SSO
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; limited public security/compliance disclosures; pricing opacity	Can be expensive/complex; may be less specialized in development feasibility automation vs niche tools	May lack PointData-style proprietary feasibility/land economics modelling depth (depends on use case)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

PointData vs CoreLogic/Cotality:
- PointData is more specialized in evaluating development potential and economic viability rather than primarily reporting historical sales and standardized valuations.
- CoreLogic is stronger for enterprises needing broad, standardized property datasets, established compliance processes, and mature valuation workflows.
PointData vs Landchecker:
- Landchecker is positioned as a self-serve planning/property intelligence platform with explicit tiered plans and enterprise features (e.g., SAML SSO).
- PointData’s relative advantage is the emphasis on ML models and development feasibility/land economics outputs; these claims should be validated against local planning rules and through sample outputs.
PointData vs PropTrack:
- PropTrack provides API access linked to a major portal ecosystem and is strong in listings and market dynamics.
- PointData focuses on planning feasibility, climate risk layers, and development potential analytics.

Adoption trends / market share

No reliable public market share numbers were identified for PointData; adoption evidence is primarily vendor marketing materials, case studies, LinkedIn presence, and described partnerships.

	PointData	CoreLogic / Cotality (AU)	Landchecker
Starting Price	Valeri Premium: low-cost monthly subscription (other offerings: quote-based)	Not publicly standardized (typically enterprise quote-based)	Free Starter (paid tiers; Enterprise is quote-based)
Best For	Development feasibility screening, planning algorithms, land economics modelling, micro-granular indices	Broad property data, valuation workflows, large-scale enterprise	Planning/property reporting, mapping layers, self-serve workflows; teams wanting explicit enterprise features
Key Strength	Combination of planning, valuation, and land economics modelling; API + bespoke packs; development-specific modelling focus	Breadth of datasets and established enterprise relationships; mature valuation ecosystems	Clear plan tiers; strong self-serve UX in many workflows; Enterprise mentions SAML SSO
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; limited public security/compliance disclosures; pricing opacity	Can be expensive/complex; may be less specialized in development feasibility automation vs niche tools	May lack PointData-style proprietary feasibility/land economics modelling depth (depends on use case)

PointData

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Adoption trends / market share

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Adoption trends / market share

02Market Map