PullRequest

Name: PullRequest
Brand: PullRequest

PullRequest (HackerOne Code) is a code-review-as-a-service platform that connects to source control systems, combines AI-assisted risk prioritization with a network of vetted human reviewers, and delivers inline feedback on bugs, maintainability, and security within developer workflows.

Est 2017|Valuation $36M|Raised $10.5M

LinkedIn 1K|Web traffic 7K|FTEs 21|HQ Austin, Texas, United States

MarketsApplication Security Testing (AST)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

PullRequest vs GitHub Code Security: GitHub provides an automated security product priced per active committer. PullRequest is a managed service that provides human reviewers and contextual feedback at a higher per-developer cost.
PullRequest vs Semgrep: Semgrep is a tool-oriented platform emphasizing policy-as-code and continuous scanning; PullRequest emphasizes expert human review for nuanced feedback.
PullRequest vs Codacy: Codacy positions as a lower-cost automated code quality and security scanning tool. PullRequest differentiates by providing human expertise and validation.

- PullRequest vs GitHub Code Security: GitHub provides an automated security product priced per active committer. PullRequest is a managed service that provides human reviewers and contextual feedback at a higher per-developer cost. - PullRequest vs Semgrep: Semgrep is a tool-oriented platform emphasizing policy-as-code and continuous scanning; PullRequest emphasizes expert human review for nuanced feedback. - PullRequest vs Codacy: Codacy positions as a lower-cost automated code quality and security scanning tool. PullRequest differentiates by providing human expertise and validation.

	PullRequest (HackerOne Code)	GitHub Code Security (GHAS unbundled)	Semgrep Code
Starting Price	Per-developer pricing billed annually in the low hundreds per month	Per-active committer pricing at a per-committer monthly rate in the tens of dollars	Per-contributor monthly pricing in the tens of dollars for Teams
Best For	Teams that want human review embedded in PR workflow and prioritized triage	Teams standardizing on GitHub-native code scanning and remediation workflows	Teams needing configurable SAST with commercial rulepacks and cross-file analysis
Key Strength	Human review and contextual feedback; vendor-provided prioritization workflows	Deep integration into GitHub (code scanning, alerts, autofix features)	SAST depth, rule customization, and scaling for security teams
Key Weakness	Higher cost; external code access risk; coverage model may not include all PRs without additional spend	Tends to be GitHub-centric and requires process maturity to manage alerts	Tool-driven model rather than expert human review; some community concerns reported for commercialization