Qlik Talend Data Catalog

Name: Qlik Talend Data Catalog
Brand: Qlik Technologies
Rating: 4.3 (23 reviews)

Leader

Do Data Differently

Est 1993|Valuation $2.9B|Raised $13.7B

LinkedIn 307K|Website|Web traffic 1.0M|FTEs 4,586|HQ King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, US

MarketsData Governance Data Catalog

Platform CoversData Privacy Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas of relative strength: the product may be most appropriate for organizations that run Talend integration jobs and require lineage and impact analysis across those pipelines, and for organizations that integrate catalog data with Qlik analytics workflows.
Areas where competitors may perform better: tools with stronger reputations for consumer-facing UX and collaborative, organization-wide adoption are often shortlisted by buyers focused heavily on end-user adoption. Microsoft Purview may offer lower friction for Microsoft-centric environments due to ecosystem bundling.
Pricing and value: community commentary suggests that some buyers perceive licensing pressure from Talend/Qlik, which can influence consideration of open-source or cloud-native alternatives.

- Areas of relative strength: the product may be most appropriate for organizations that run Talend integration jobs and require lineage and impact analysis across those pipelines, and for organizations that integrate catalog data with Qlik analytics workflows. - Areas where competitors may perform better: tools with stronger reputations for consumer-facing UX and collaborative, organization-wide adoption are often shortlisted by buyers focused heavily on end-user adoption. Microsoft Purview may offer lower friction for Microsoft-centric environments due to ecosystem bundling. - Pricing and value: community commentary suggests that some buyers perceive licensing pressure from Talend/Qlik, which can influence consideration of open-source or cloud-native alternatives.

	Qlik Talend Data Catalog	Alation Data Catalog	Atlan
Starting Price	Not publicly listed on vendor site; procurement artifacts indicate non-trivial annual pricing for administrative packs	Quote-based/Not public	Quote-based/Not public
Typical Fit	Enterprises requiring comprehensive metadata harvesting, lineage and integration with Talend/Qlik ecosystems	Enterprises prioritizing broad adoption, stewardship workflows, and catalog as a collaboration hub	Teams seeking a cloud-native catalog with collaborative UX and frequent data platform integrations
Key Strength	Emphasis on metadata harvesting and lineage and integration with Talend integration jobs and Qlik workflows	Market presence and governance/adoption patterns; community of practice focus	Cloud-native UX and collaboration features; perceived fast time-to-value
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity and procurement complexity; potential perception of legacy architecture in some contexts	Enterprise implementation complexity and cost	May be less mature for some large, regulated enterprise governance scenarios