Qflow

Name: Qflow
Brand: Qualis Flow (Qflow)

The On-Site Truth Captured In Seconds: Construction Materials, Waste and Carbon Data Platform

Est 2018|Valuation $33.1M|Raised $19.6M|41 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 6K|FTEs 49|HQ London, United Kingdom

MarketsSupply Chain Visibility Materials Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

1) Qflow vs. Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud - Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud are broad project management and collaboration platforms. Qflow is more specialised in converting site paperwork into structured data for materials and waste tracking. - For gaps in RFIs/submittals/drawings/field issues, Procore/Autodesk are more comprehensive; for improving as-built material and waste evidence quality, Qflow may provide more targeted capabilities, subject to field adoption. 2) Qflow vs. EC3 / One Click LCA (carbon tools) - EC3 provides a free embodied carbon database and comparison tools; One Click LCA provides paid LCA/compliance tooling with integrations and datasets. - Qflow’s typical role is upstream: capturing as-built quantities and evidence that carbon assessment tools can consume. 3) Integrations as competitive strategy - Qflow has announced integrations and export workflows with carbon assessment tools, indicating it is intended to function as a data-capture layer to feed carbon assessment tooling. Some integrations are documented as export/import workflows suitable for LCA tools.

	Qflow (Qualis Flow)	Procore	One Click LCA
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (demo/quote-led)	Quote-based (custom quote)	Quote-based (request a quote)
Primary use case	Capturing as-built site evidence: deliveries, waste movements, utilities; traceability and data capture for carbon-related workflows	Broad construction project execution platform (PM, quality/safety, collaboration)	LCA & carbon modeling/compliance using LCA datasets and integrations
Key Strength	Mobile-first capture of site documentation and workflows to generate structured delivery/waste records	End-to-end operational platform; large ecosystem and adoption	Comprehensive LCA functionality and dataset depth
Key Weakness	Limited public documentation on security certifications, limited third-party review footprint; operational success depends on site adoption discipline	May be heavyweight for teams seeking focused delivery-note digitisation	Requires reliable quantity data upstream; not primarily a field capture tool

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Qflow vs. Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud

Procore and Autodesk Construction Cloud are broad project management and collaboration platforms. Qflow is more specialised in converting site paperwork into structured data for materials and waste tracking.
For gaps in RFIs/submittals/drawings/field issues, Procore/Autodesk are more comprehensive; for improving as-built material and waste evidence quality, Qflow may provide more targeted capabilities, subject to field adoption.

Qflow vs. EC3 / One Click LCA (carbon tools)

EC3 provides a free embodied carbon database and comparison tools; One Click LCA provides paid LCA/compliance tooling with integrations and datasets.
Qflow’s typical role is upstream: capturing as-built quantities and evidence that carbon assessment tools can consume.

Integrations as competitive strategy

Qflow has announced integrations and export workflows with carbon assessment tools, indicating it is intended to function as a data-capture layer to feed carbon assessment tooling. Some integrations are documented as export/import workflows suitable for LCA tools.

	Qflow (Qualis Flow)	Procore	One Click LCA
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (demo/quote-led)	Quote-based (custom quote)	Quote-based (request a quote)
Primary use case	Capturing as-built site evidence: deliveries, waste movements, utilities; traceability and data capture for carbon-related workflows	Broad construction project execution platform (PM, quality/safety, collaboration)	LCA & carbon modeling/compliance using LCA datasets and integrations
Key Strength	Mobile-first capture of site documentation and workflows to generate structured delivery/waste records	End-to-end operational platform; large ecosystem and adoption	Comprehensive LCA functionality and dataset depth
Key Weakness	Limited public documentation on security certifications, limited third-party review footprint; operational success depends on site adoption discipline	May be heavyweight for teams seeking focused delivery-note digitisation	Requires reliable quantity data upstream; not primarily a field capture tool