Qzzr

Name: Qzzr
Brand: Qzzr
Rating: 4.1 (22 reviews)

The quiz maker that makes sense. Finally.

Est 2013|Valuation $23.7M|Raised $7.4M

LinkedIn 458|Website|Web traffic 19K|FTEs 12|HQ Saarbrücken, Saarland, DE

MarketsQuiz & Funnel Builders

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Qzzr vs Riddle - Riddle’s pricing and product documentation emphasize customization, enterprise controls, and governance features at higher tiers. - Given records indicating a past acquisition, buyers should clarify whether Qzzr operates as a separate product line, a rebranded edition, or as a distinct go-to-market motion for smaller customers. Qzzr vs Interact - Interact defines plan tiers by quiz count and lead volume and gates advanced branding and conversion tracking features behind higher tiers. - Qzzr positions itself as providing broad feature access at lower price points, though user reports indicate less flexibility for branding customization. Qzzr vs Typeform (positioning) - The vendor has published comparison content positioning Qzzr as an alternative to Typeform; such vendor-authored comparisons are marketing materials and should be treated as potentially biased.

Market share and adoption trends

No reliable, recent public market-share numbers were identified. Historical press indicates notable usage during earlier quiz-traffic trends, but those figures do not necessarily reflect current competitive dynamics.

	Qzzr	Riddle	Interact
Starting Price	Free tier with a limited number of completions; published usage-based and paid tiers available from the vendor	Published entry-level monthly pricing; higher-tier plans available per vendor pricing page	Published entry-level pricing with discounted terms for annual billing available from the vendor
Best For	SMBs/creators that prioritize low initial cost and rapid quiz deployment	Publishers/marketing teams needing broader formats, greater customization, and enterprise options	Lead-gen quizzes with structured tiers for lead volume and branding
Key Strength	Low entry cost and messaging that features are available across tiers	Broader pricing tiers and enterprise-grade features (custom CSS, APIs, governance in higher tiers)	Focus on lead generation with clear plan tiers tied to lead volume and branding
Key Weakness	User reports often cite limited customization and basic reporting	Higher baseline cost relative to basic quiz builders; may be excessive for simple use cases	Typically more expensive than Qzzr for low-volume use; plan features are gated by tier

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Qzzr vs Riddle

Riddle’s pricing and product documentation emphasize customization, enterprise controls, and governance features at higher tiers.
Given records indicating a past acquisition, buyers should clarify whether Qzzr operates as a separate product line, a rebranded edition, or as a distinct go-to-market motion for smaller customers.

Qzzr vs Interact

Interact defines plan tiers by quiz count and lead volume and gates advanced branding and conversion tracking features behind higher tiers.
Qzzr positions itself as providing broad feature access at lower price points, though user reports indicate less flexibility for branding customization.

Qzzr vs Typeform (positioning)

The vendor has published comparison content positioning Qzzr as an alternative to Typeform; such vendor-authored comparisons are marketing materials and should be treated as potentially biased.

Market share and adoption trends

	Qzzr	Riddle	Interact
Starting Price	Free tier with a limited number of completions; published usage-based and paid tiers available from the vendor	Published entry-level monthly pricing; higher-tier plans available per vendor pricing page	Published entry-level pricing with discounted terms for annual billing available from the vendor
Best For	SMBs/creators that prioritize low initial cost and rapid quiz deployment	Publishers/marketing teams needing broader formats, greater customization, and enterprise options	Lead-gen quizzes with structured tiers for lead volume and branding
Key Strength	Low entry cost and messaging that features are available across tiers	Broader pricing tiers and enterprise-grade features (custom CSS, APIs, governance in higher tiers)	Focus on lead generation with clear plan tiers tied to lead volume and branding
Key Weakness	User reports often cite limited customization and basic reporting	Higher baseline cost relative to basic quiz builders; may be excessive for simple use cases	Typically more expensive than Qzzr for low-volume use; plan features are gated by tier