Range

Name: Range
Brand: Range
Rating: 4.6 (106 reviews)

Range is a team communication tool for check-ins, meeting management, goals, and strengthening team culture.

Est 2017|Valuation $24M|Raised $16.5M

LinkedIn 2K|Website|Web traffic 12K|FTEs 14|HQ San Francisco, California, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Situations where Range has relative advantages - Organizations seeking a consolidated location for recurring check-ins, meeting agendas/notes/action items, and goal tracking rather than assembling separate point solutions. - Teams that benefit from deeper integrations and a dedicated web product in addition to in-chat notifications. Situations where competitors may be preferred - Geekbot: for organizations that primarily want to collect standup answers in Slack/Teams with minimal configuration and lower cost. - Standuply: when the requirement is for more explicit agile ceremony automation inside Slack (e.g., retrospectives, planning workflows). - Work management suites (Asana/Jira): organizations that enforce a single system of record may prefer to use existing status and reporting features rather than add an additional hub. Adoption trends / market signal - Press coverage indicates Range grew during the remote-work acceleration era; the accessible sources here do not provide a current market-share estimate.

	Range	Geekbot	Standuply
Starting Price	Free tier for small teams; published per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Free tier for small teams; published per-participant pricing available from the vendor	Free tier for small usage; paid tiers vary per vendor published plans
Primary Use Case	Teams wanting check-ins, meeting artifacts, and goal tracking with integrations	Teams wanting a simple Slack/Teams standup bot	Teams wanting standups and automated Slack workflows for agile ceremonies
Key Strength	Broader set of recurring check-in and meeting-management features combined with integrations and goals	Low-friction in-chat collection; lower cost for basic standups	Rich Slack bot workflows (standups, surveys, some agile ceremonies)
Key Weakness	Higher cost compared with basic bots if only standups are required; adoption and process change required	Less of a comprehensive platform; may not replace meeting or goals workflows	Can become complex; pricing and configuration can be more involved

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Situations where Range has relative advantages

Organizations seeking a consolidated location for recurring check-ins, meeting agendas/notes/action items, and goal tracking rather than assembling separate point solutions.
Teams that benefit from deeper integrations and a dedicated web product in addition to in-chat notifications.

Situations where competitors may be preferred

Geekbot: for organizations that primarily want to collect standup answers in Slack/Teams with minimal configuration and lower cost.
Standuply: when the requirement is for more explicit agile ceremony automation inside Slack (e.g., retrospectives, planning workflows).
Work management suites (Asana/Jira): organizations that enforce a single system of record may prefer to use existing status and reporting features rather than add an additional hub.

Adoption trends / market signal

Press coverage indicates Range grew during the remote-work acceleration era; the accessible sources here do not provide a current market-share estimate.

	Range	Geekbot	Standuply
Starting Price	Free tier for small teams; published per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Free tier for small teams; published per-participant pricing available from the vendor	Free tier for small usage; paid tiers vary per vendor published plans
Primary Use Case	Teams wanting check-ins, meeting artifacts, and goal tracking with integrations	Teams wanting a simple Slack/Teams standup bot	Teams wanting standups and automated Slack workflows for agile ceremonies
Key Strength	Broader set of recurring check-in and meeting-management features combined with integrations and goals	Low-friction in-chat collection; lower cost for basic standups	Rich Slack bot workflows (standups, surveys, some agile ceremonies)
Key Weakness	Higher cost compared with basic bots if only standups are required; adoption and process change required	Less of a comprehensive platform; may not replace meeting or goals workflows	Can become complex; pricing and configuration can be more involved

Range

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map