- If an organization requires extremely low false positives for specialized appliances (F5, vCenter, etc.) out of the box: community reports suggest fingerprinting gaps can generate large false-positive volumes.
- If an organization has a small team and requires extensive automation and plug-and-play integrations: at least one G2 review reports limited automation and integration options, which can increase manual workload.
- If support responsiveness is mission-critical and an organization has experienced prior vendor support issues: community comments describe slow or inefficient ticket handling. Validate service-level agreements, premium support options, and escalation paths.
- If an organization cannot meet the pricing minimums or the asset-based model does not match procurement needs: the published pricing notes a minimum asset basis.
- If the requirement is for a simple scanner-only tool: organizations seeking only scanner functionality may evaluate Tenable Nessus as an alternative.
- **False positives / platform fingerprinting limitations:** community reports specifically cite F5 and vCenter detection gaps.
- **Coverage gaps for some software:** at least one G2 review cites missing coverage for specific software (e.g., Visual Studio, Nvidia).
- **Support and bug backlog concerns:** community feedback describes repeated bugs and slow resolution.
- **Infrastructure requirements:** collectors have minimum hardware needs (2 cores, 8GB RAM, 60GB disk), and scaling requires planning; inadequate sizing can impact performance and stability.