REmited

Name: REmited
Brand: REmited

AI Native

From Receipt based Offline Data Analysis Solution to Hyper Targeting E-Commerce Platform

Est 2023|Valuation $6M|Raised $570K

LinkedIn 266|Website|FTEs 12|HQ Seoul, Seoul, KR

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Potential strengths:

For buyers prioritizing item-level offline purchase granularity in Korea and rapid experimentation, the vendor’s app-based receipt collection model may be of interest.
The vendor’s entry survey tier is publicly positioned as a lower-cost entry point relative to typical enterprise research contracts.

Incumbent strengths:

Numerator and NielsenIQ typically provide greater methodological transparency, governance, and procurement readiness.
Incumbent datasets may be easier to defend in enterprise governance processes due to longer track records and published methodologies.

Market share/adoption trends: No credible, independent market-share data for REmited was found in the public materials reviewed.

Potential strengths: - For buyers prioritizing item-level offline purchase granularity in Korea and rapid experimentation, the vendor’s app-based receipt collection model may be of interest. - The vendor’s entry survey tier is publicly positioned as a lower-cost entry point relative to typical enterprise research contracts. Incumbent strengths: - Numerator and NielsenIQ typically provide greater methodological transparency, governance, and procurement readiness. - Incumbent datasets may be easier to defend in enterprise governance processes due to longer track records and published methodologies. Market share/adoption trends: No credible, independent market-share data for REmited was found in the public materials reviewed.

	REmited (vendor website)	Numerator (Insights / OmniPanel)	NielsenIQ (consumer panel / receipt-related offerings)
Starting price	Published entry-level survey pricing for a small respondent cohort (vendor-published entry tier)	Not publicly listed (enterprise/contract pricing)	Not publicly listed (enterprise/contract pricing)
Primary use cases	Korea-focused CPG and retail teams seeking item-level receipt data, surveys, and potential activation	Brands needing longitudinal omnichannel purchase and attitudinal insights from a large panel	Large brands and retailers requiring established panel and measurement infrastructure
Key strength	Integration of consumer app, receipt collection, and insight surfaces; accessible entry-level survey tier	Mature panel infrastructure and documented receipt-verified sources	Global enterprise credibility and established methodologies
Key weakness	Limited public documentation on security/compliance, independent reviews, and methodology transparency	Can be costly and require complex procurement	Often higher-cost and may be less flexible for rapid experimentation

REmited

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map