Remote

Name: Remote
Brand: Remote Technology, Inc.

Remote is a global HR and employment platform that enables companies to hire, pay, and manage international employees and contractors by providing Employer of Record services, contractor management, global payroll processing, and basic HRIS functionality.

Est 2019|Valuation $2.9B|Raised $505.7M|30 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 665K|Web traffic 1.8M|FTEs 1,400|HQ Wilmington, DE

MarketsGlobal Employment & PEO Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative comparison

Remote vs Deel - Pricing: Publicly advertised starting prices can be similar depending on billing terms and discounts; Remote's EOR pricing is presented in the mid-to-high hundreds per employee/month with some alternate rates shown, while some competitors present lower advertised entry points. - Platform scope: Deel presents a broader platform across HR, payroll, and IT workflows; Remote focuses on global employment and payroll workflows. - Community sentiment: Public anecdotes on community forums vary by country and account team; some users report preferring certain competitors for specific processes or speed in particular regions. Remote vs Papaya Global - Papaya emphasizes payments infrastructure and mass payouts; Remote emphasizes entity ownership claims and published flat-rate pricing for core products. - Papaya’s public pricing is generally quote-based, which some buyers find less transparent in early evaluation. Remote vs Rippling (adjacent competitor) - Rippling often scores higher on HR portal depth and payroll workflow features in some comparison summaries, while Remote receives positive feedback for usability and core global employment features. Rippling may be more appropriate where a deeper HRIS plus IT device/identity management bundle is required.

	Remote	Deel	Papaya Global
Starting Price (EOR)	Mid-to-high hundreds per employee/month (some pages show a lower alternate rate)	Lower starting point in public materials	Quote-based publicly; third-party sources commonly cite pricing in the hundreds per employee/month range
Starting Price (Contractors)	Tens per contractor/month	Higher tens per contractor/month in some public sources	Typically cited near the low tens per contractor/month in third-party sources
Typical buyer / use case	Companies prioritizing ownership of entity infrastructure claims and published flat pricing for global employment	Companies seeking an integrated platform across HR, payroll, and workforce operations	Organizations valuing payments infrastructure and large-scale payroll/payments operations
Key comparative strength	Published flat-rate pricing for core products; focus on core global employment workflows	Broad platform scope across HR and IT workflows	Payments infrastructure and mass payouts for large workforces
Key comparative weakness	Public reviews reference support variability and premium price sensitivity for very small teams	Platform breadth and modular pricing can be complex; costs can accumulate	Less transparent pricing on public pages; implementation fees and transaction costs cited in some accounts

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative comparison

Remote vs Deel

Pricing: Publicly advertised starting prices can be similar depending on billing terms and discounts; Remote's EOR pricing is presented in the mid-to-high hundreds per employee/month with some alternate rates shown, while some competitors present lower advertised entry points.
Platform scope: Deel presents a broader platform across HR, payroll, and IT workflows; Remote focuses on global employment and payroll workflows.
Community sentiment: Public anecdotes on community forums vary by country and account team; some users report preferring certain competitors for specific processes or speed in particular regions.

Remote vs Papaya Global

Papaya emphasizes payments infrastructure and mass payouts; Remote emphasizes entity ownership claims and published flat-rate pricing for core products.
Papaya’s public pricing is generally quote-based, which some buyers find less transparent in early evaluation.

Remote vs Rippling (adjacent competitor)

Rippling often scores higher on HR portal depth and payroll workflow features in some comparison summaries, while Remote receives positive feedback for usability and core global employment features. Rippling may be more appropriate where a deeper HRIS plus IT device/identity management bundle is required.

	Remote	Deel	Papaya Global
Starting Price (EOR)	Mid-to-high hundreds per employee/month (some pages show a lower alternate rate)	Lower starting point in public materials	Quote-based publicly; third-party sources commonly cite pricing in the hundreds per employee/month range
Starting Price (Contractors)	Tens per contractor/month	Higher tens per contractor/month in some public sources	Typically cited near the low tens per contractor/month in third-party sources
Typical buyer / use case	Companies prioritizing ownership of entity infrastructure claims and published flat pricing for global employment	Companies seeking an integrated platform across HR, payroll, and workforce operations	Organizations valuing payments infrastructure and large-scale payroll/payments operations
Key comparative strength	Published flat-rate pricing for core products; focus on core global employment workflows	Broad platform scope across HR and IT workflows	Payments infrastructure and mass payouts for large workforces
Key comparative weakness	Public reviews reference support variability and premium price sensitivity for very small teams	Platform breadth and modular pricing can be complex; costs can accumulate	Less transparent pricing on public pages; implementation fees and transaction costs cited in some accounts