Right-Hand Cybersecurity
Next generation Human Risk Management platform to automate and personalize your Security Awareness program.
Est 2019|Valuation $3.7M|Raised $7.1M
Next generation Human Risk Management platform to automate and personalize your Security Awareness program.
Published Sep 26, 2026
The vendor markets agent-driven capabilities; procurement teams should validate:
Likely decision drivers include:
Potential drivers of churn to validate:
Representative industries in the category include IT services, accounting, cybersecurity, financial services, and higher education. Buyers should validate industry-specific content coverage where required.
Decision makers: CISO, Head of Security Awareness, Security Program Manager, GRC lead, IT director. End users: all employees, with targeted programs for high-exposure roles such as finance, HR, and executives.
Get a comprehensive analysis of Right-Hand Cybersecurity including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.
Download full report →Organizations that require extensive third-party validation across multiple review and analyst platforms If procurement processes require comprehensive coverage on platforms such as Gartner Peer Insights and TrustRadius, Right-Hand may present validation challenges based on the sources reviewed.
Organizations that require transparent, self-serve pricing If a procurement decision depends on quick, publicly available budgetary pricing without sales engagement, vendors with published pricing or smaller SAT tools with transparent pricing may be more suitable.
Organizations that prioritize maximum market maturity and long track records Large incumbents (for example, KnowBe4 or Proofpoint) may present lower perceived vendor risk for highly regulated enterprises where extensive third-party validation and long-standing market presence are prioritized.
Organizations with complex compliance and identity requirements If documented SSO/SAML, SCIM provisioning, detailed audit exports, and strict retention controls are mandatory and the vendor cannot provide sufficient documentation under NDA or in a demo, an alternative vendor with established enterprise IAM documentation may be preferred.
Positive (G2, example):
Notes on review context:
Negative / skepticism signals (platform credibility context):
A robust set of low-rated, Right-Hand-specific reviews across multiple independent platforms was not identified in the accessible dataset. Common category-level concerns for SAT/HRM deployments that procurement teams should validate include:
Important limitation: This research did not retrieve a comprehensive set of low-rated, independently verifiable Right-Hand-specific customer quotes. Procurement teams should request customer references and conduct pilots.
Critical evaluation:
Right-Hand Cybersecurity is described by the vendor as a Human Risk Management (HRM) platform that combines security awareness training, phishing simulations, and phishing reporting/remediation workflows to address employee-driven security risk. Vendor materials describe an emphasis on behavior change rather than compliance-focused training and reference features such as real-time nudges/interventions, risk analytics, and integrations into common enterprise security stacks.
In a vendor one-pager, Right-Hand frames the product as a consolidated platform intended to prevent, detect, and respond to employee security incidents (for example, phishing) via integrated training, report-button workflows for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and remediation capabilities to remove phishing messages across mailboxes.
Right-Hand appears to target:
Positioning themes reflected in vendor materials include: