RingCentral Single Sign On

Name: RingCentral Single Sign On
Brand: RingCentral

Leader

The all-in-one AI communications platform ✨

Est 1999|Valuation $6.3B|Raised $2.8B

LinkedIn 318K|Website|Web traffic 10.8M|FTEs 6,718|HQ Belmont, California, US

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & SSO Identity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

RingCentral vs Dialpad - Dialpad’s public materials indicate SSO is an enterprise-level feature; entry tiers are publicly priced and may be cost-effective for SMBs, but enabling SSO typically requires enterprise-level engagement with sales. - RingCentral states SSO is included in higher-tier plans, which can simplify procurement by making tier requirements transparent, though it may increase cost relative to vendors that include SSO in lower tiers. RingCentral vs 8x8 - 8x8 documentation shows SAML 2.0 SSO and some federated options (for example, Google OAuth for certain apps). - 8x8 packaging and pricing may be quote-based; identity automation constraints depend on plan. RingCentral vs Nextiva - Nextiva’s pricing and product materials include SSO in some bundles; ensure comparisons reference the correct product family (UC vs CX) when evaluating alternatives.

Market adoption / trends (cautious)

RingCentral remains a major UCaaS vendor and is frequently covered by industry press regarding product and integration announcements.
Positioning SSO as a paid feature influences competitive dynamics and can create pressure from competitors that bundle SSO differently or from enterprise buyers who treat SSO as table stakes.

	RingCentral RingEX SSO	Dialpad (business comms)	8x8 (business comms)
Starting Price (public)	SSO typically tied to a paid higher-tier plan (vendor indicates SSO included in selected premium plans)	Published entry plans available; SSO is indicated as an enterprise-level feature that requires sales engagement	Pricing varies; SSO supported (SAML 2.0) according to vendor documentation; many plans are quote-based
Best For	Organizations standardized on RingEX who need SAML SSO and broad UCaaS features	Teams seeking UC features at entry price; SSO may require enterprise-level engagement	Organizations needing UC and CC options with global calling bundles; SAML 2.0 support across multiple apps
Key Strength	SAML 2.0 compatibility with multiple IdPs; broad integrations ecosystem	Published entry pricing and clear plan structure; modern UI reputation	Broad platform with SAML 2.0 support and Google OAuth options for some apps
Key Weakness	SSO is a paid-tier feature; community reports of support and billing friction; incident impact can affect access	SSO appears gated to enterprise in public pricing; unclear which security controls are included without sales engagement	Pricing opacity (often quote-based); provisioning/SCIM limitations reported by third parties; administrative overhead

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

RingCentral vs Dialpad

Dialpad’s public materials indicate SSO is an enterprise-level feature; entry tiers are publicly priced and may be cost-effective for SMBs, but enabling SSO typically requires enterprise-level engagement with sales.
RingCentral states SSO is included in higher-tier plans, which can simplify procurement by making tier requirements transparent, though it may increase cost relative to vendors that include SSO in lower tiers.

RingCentral vs 8x8

8x8 documentation shows SAML 2.0 SSO and some federated options (for example, Google OAuth for certain apps).
8x8 packaging and pricing may be quote-based; identity automation constraints depend on plan.

RingCentral vs Nextiva

Nextiva’s pricing and product materials include SSO in some bundles; ensure comparisons reference the correct product family (UC vs CX) when evaluating alternatives.

Market adoption / trends (cautious)

RingCentral remains a major UCaaS vendor and is frequently covered by industry press regarding product and integration announcements.
Positioning SSO as a paid feature influences competitive dynamics and can create pressure from competitors that bundle SSO differently or from enterprise buyers who treat SSO as table stakes.

	RingCentral RingEX SSO	Dialpad (business comms)	8x8 (business comms)
Starting Price (public)	SSO typically tied to a paid higher-tier plan (vendor indicates SSO included in selected premium plans)	Published entry plans available; SSO is indicated as an enterprise-level feature that requires sales engagement	Pricing varies; SSO supported (SAML 2.0) according to vendor documentation; many plans are quote-based
Best For	Organizations standardized on RingEX who need SAML SSO and broad UCaaS features	Teams seeking UC features at entry price; SSO may require enterprise-level engagement	Organizations needing UC and CC options with global calling bundles; SAML 2.0 support across multiple apps
Key Strength	SAML 2.0 compatibility with multiple IdPs; broad integrations ecosystem	Published entry pricing and clear plan structure; modern UI reputation	Broad platform with SAML 2.0 support and Google OAuth options for some apps
Key Weakness	SSO is a paid-tier feature; community reports of support and billing friction; incident impact can affect access	SSO appears gated to enterprise in public pricing; unclear which security controls are included without sales engagement	Pricing opacity (often quote-based); provisioning/SCIM limitations reported by third parties; administrative overhead