Risilience

Name: Risilience
Brand: Risilience

AI Native

Climate and nature risk is business risk.

Est 2021|Valuation $51.8M|Raised $33M|12 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Website|FTEs 73|HQ Cambridge, England, GB

MarketsESG & Sustainability Investment Analytics Board Reporting for ESG & Sustainability

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

#### Differentiation: areas of relative differentiation for Risilience - **Financial quantification focus:** The vendor emphasizes financially quantified risk and opportunity, using an earnings value-at-risk framing. - **Physical + transition risk in one lens:** The platform is presented as integrating physical and transition risk analysis. - **Nature risk capability:** The vendor has launched a Nature platform as part of a combined sustainability intelligence suite. - **Analyst mentions (vendor-cited):** The vendor cites recognition in analyst materials and buyer guides. #### Where competitors may be stronger - **Workflow-centric disclosure management:** Tools like Sweep focus heavily on CSRD compliance workflows and broad ESG data collection, which may suit organizations prioritizing enterprise-wide ESG data coordination rather than specialized risk quantification. - **Carbon accounting transparency and certifications:** Persefoni publishes plan structures and security/compliance claims; buyers may find procurement faster where certifications and plan details are explicit. - **Ecosystem/integrations:** Larger platforms (IBM Envizi, Sphera) may benefit from broader integration ecosystems and existing enterprise deployments. #### Market adoption signals (evidence limits) - Risilience has recognizable enterprise references cited in press and on its site, and it has completed later-stage venture funding. Beyond that, verified public adoption metrics such as ARR and customer count are not available.

	Risilience (Riise)	Persefoni	Sweep
Starting Price	Not public	“Pro” plan advertised as free; enterprise offerings not fully priced publicly	Not public (third-party estimates exist, but vendor pricing not posted)
Recommended for	Enterprises needing financially quantified climate + nature risk (physical + transition) and scenario analysis	Companies prioritizing carbon accounting + disclosure workflows (with emerging climate risk capabilities)	Companies wanting ESG/carbon data management + CSRD-oriented audit-appropriate reporting workflows
Key strengths	Integrated physical + transition risk framing; academic research connections; emphasis on financial materiality	Productization around carbon accounting/reporting; publishes security/compliance claims on pricing page	Positioning around compliance workflows (e.g., CSRD) and ESG/carbon data coordination
Key weaknesses	Limited public third-party reviews; pricing opacity; security certifications not clearly published	Depth of financial risk quantification may differ vs specialist climate risk vendors; enterprise pricing can be material	Pricing opacity; breadth across ESG may reduce depth in financial risk quantification

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiation: areas of relative differentiation for Risilience

Financial quantification focus: The vendor emphasizes financially quantified risk and opportunity, using an earnings value-at-risk framing.
Physical + transition risk in one lens: The platform is presented as integrating physical and transition risk analysis.
Nature risk capability: The vendor has launched a Nature platform as part of a combined sustainability intelligence suite.
Analyst mentions (vendor-cited): The vendor cites recognition in analyst materials and buyer guides.

Where competitors may be stronger

Workflow-centric disclosure management: Tools like Sweep focus heavily on CSRD compliance workflows and broad ESG data collection, which may suit organizations prioritizing enterprise-wide ESG data coordination rather than specialized risk quantification.
Carbon accounting transparency and certifications: Persefoni publishes plan structures and security/compliance claims; buyers may find procurement faster where certifications and plan details are explicit.
Ecosystem/integrations: Larger platforms (IBM Envizi, Sphera) may benefit from broader integration ecosystems and existing enterprise deployments.

Market adoption signals (evidence limits)

Risilience has recognizable enterprise references cited in press and on its site, and it has completed later-stage venture funding. Beyond that, verified public adoption metrics such as ARR and customer count are not available.

	Risilience (Riise)	Persefoni	Sweep
Starting Price	Not public	“Pro” plan advertised as free; enterprise offerings not fully priced publicly	Not public (third-party estimates exist, but vendor pricing not posted)
Recommended for	Enterprises needing financially quantified climate + nature risk (physical + transition) and scenario analysis	Companies prioritizing carbon accounting + disclosure workflows (with emerging climate risk capabilities)	Companies wanting ESG/carbon data management + CSRD-oriented audit-appropriate reporting workflows
Key strengths	Integrated physical + transition risk framing; academic research connections; emphasis on financial materiality	Productization around carbon accounting/reporting; publishes security/compliance claims on pricing page	Positioning around compliance workflows (e.g., CSRD) and ESG/carbon data coordination
Key weaknesses	Limited public third-party reviews; pricing opacity; security certifications not clearly published	Depth of financial risk quantification may differ vs specialist climate risk vendors; enterprise pricing can be material	Pricing opacity; breadth across ESG may reduce depth in financial risk quantification