Riskified

Name: Riskified
Brand: Riskified
Rating: 4.4 (278 reviews)

Leader

Riskified (NYSE:RSKD) empowers businesses to unleash ecommerce growth by taking risk off the table

Est 2013|Valuation $702.5M|Raised $594.8M|37 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 68K|Web traffic 44K|FTEs 670|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsFraud Detection

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- Riskified and Signifyd compete on guarantee-based commercial models and liability transfer. Vendor comparisons and landing pages are marketing materials and should be validated through independent reviews and reference checks. - Kount emphasizes identity trust and broader customer-journey coverage (fraud, ATO, bots), which may be advantageous for merchants prioritizing those use cases. - Sift and Stripe Radar may be more directly attractive when merchants require tighter integration with an existing payment stack or greater in-house control; Riskified is frequently chosen when merchants prefer more outsourced risk ownership and guarantee arrangements.

Adoption / market signal indicators

Mindshare and engagement metrics on peer-review sites provide signals about vendor presence but are not equivalent to audited market share.

	Riskified	Signifyd	Kount
Starting Price	Quote-based (not publicly listed)	Quote-based / sales-led	Quote-based (request a quote)
Most applicable for	Mid-market / enterprise merchants seeking chargeback protection combined with machine-learning decisioning and adaptive checkout capabilities	Merchants prioritizing broad chargeback coverage options (including some non-fraud chargebacks in certain programs) and fast integrations	Businesses seeking an identity and fraud platform spanning fraud, account takeover, and journey-level protections
Key Strength	Guarantee-led model; several reviews cite client service and positive approval-rate/chargeback outcomes	Market recognition in the guarantee category; broad e-commerce platform integrations	Platform breadth and multi-use-case coverage; large install base in some segments
Key Weakness	Decision explainability and customization may require vendor involvement; pricing and support experiences vary by account	Guarantee scope depends on program; some merchants report operational or billing friction	Public pricing is not transparent; effectiveness depends on tuning and high-quality data

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Riskified and Signifyd compete on guarantee-based commercial models and liability transfer. Vendor comparisons and landing pages are marketing materials and should be validated through independent reviews and reference checks.
Kount emphasizes identity trust and broader customer-journey coverage (fraud, ATO, bots), which may be advantageous for merchants prioritizing those use cases.
Sift and Stripe Radar may be more directly attractive when merchants require tighter integration with an existing payment stack or greater in-house control; Riskified is frequently chosen when merchants prefer more outsourced risk ownership and guarantee arrangements.

Adoption / market signal indicators

Mindshare and engagement metrics on peer-review sites provide signals about vendor presence but are not equivalent to audited market share.

	Riskified	Signifyd	Kount
Starting Price	Quote-based (not publicly listed)	Quote-based / sales-led	Quote-based (request a quote)
Most applicable for	Mid-market / enterprise merchants seeking chargeback protection combined with machine-learning decisioning and adaptive checkout capabilities	Merchants prioritizing broad chargeback coverage options (including some non-fraud chargebacks in certain programs) and fast integrations	Businesses seeking an identity and fraud platform spanning fraud, account takeover, and journey-level protections
Key Strength	Guarantee-led model; several reviews cite client service and positive approval-rate/chargeback outcomes	Market recognition in the guarantee category; broad e-commerce platform integrations	Platform breadth and multi-use-case coverage; large install base in some segments
Key Weakness	Decision explainability and customization may require vendor involvement; pricing and support experiences vary by account	Guarantee scope depends on program; some merchants report operational or billing friction	Public pricing is not transparent; effectiveness depends on tuning and high-quality data