Robin

Name: Robin
Brand: Robin

From room and desk booking to analytics and visitor management - we're the workplace management platform you can trust.

Est 2014|Valuation $330M|Raised $61.4M

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 230K|FTEs 283|HQ Boston, Massachusetts, US

MarketsWorkplace Management Office & Space Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- **Robin vs Envoy:** - Envoy publishes straightforward pricing and is widely recognized for visitor management depth; Robin emphasizes hybrid coordination, mapping, and workplace analytics. - If visitor management and lobby workflows are the priority, Envoy may be a stronger choice; if mapping, desk/room orchestration, and workplace analytics are primary objectives, Robin is commonly shortlisted. - **Robin vs Skedda:** - Skedda’s pricing is transparent and priced per space, which can fit teams that want predictable budgeting by bookable resource count. - Robin’s quote-based model may align better with enterprises that want bundling, custom contracts, and broad platform scope—though it increases procurement friction. - **Robin vs Teem (Eptura):** - Teem has historically had strength in meeting room scheduling; some market commentary suggests customers experienced issues following acquisition/transition. Buyers should validate current Teem reviews during procurement.

Adoption trends / market signals

The vendor has sustained press coverage around hybrid work growth and platform expansion.
Vendor-claimed metrics indicate adoption at scale per vendor statements, but these metrics were not independently verified in the reviewed sources.

	Robin	Envoy Workplace	Skedda
Starting Price	Custom / quote (annual billing)	Published per-active-user pricing (annual billing shown)	Published entry price (billed annually), priced per space
Suitable For	Mid-market/enterprise hybrid offices needing desk+room booking, maps, analytics	Organizations that want an integrated workplace suite with visitor/delivery options	Organizations that prefer pricing transparency and “spaces-based” scaling, including smaller to mid-size deployments
Key Strength	Provides workplace booking, mapping, and analytics in one platform	Transparent pricing, broad front-desk/visitor ecosystem, clear packaging	Transparent entry pricing, clear plan packaging, strong scheduling/space booking orientation
Key Weakness	Opaque pricing; floor plan maintenance can be resource-intensive; some reports of intermittent booking/check-in issues	Costs can scale depending on how “active user” is defined; suite bundling may limit à la carte purchases	May lack some higher-end enterprise workplace strategy features compared to more comprehensive suites; space-based pricing can increase with many resources

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Robin vs Envoy:
- Envoy publishes straightforward pricing and is widely recognized for visitor management depth; Robin emphasizes hybrid coordination, mapping, and workplace analytics.
- If visitor management and lobby workflows are the priority, Envoy may be a stronger choice; if mapping, desk/room orchestration, and workplace analytics are primary objectives, Robin is commonly shortlisted.
Robin vs Skedda:
- Skedda’s pricing is transparent and priced per space, which can fit teams that want predictable budgeting by bookable resource count.
- Robin’s quote-based model may align better with enterprises that want bundling, custom contracts, and broad platform scope—though it increases procurement friction.
Robin vs Teem (Eptura):
- Teem has historically had strength in meeting room scheduling; some market commentary suggests customers experienced issues following acquisition/transition. Buyers should validate current Teem reviews during procurement.

Adoption trends / market signals

The vendor has sustained press coverage around hybrid work growth and platform expansion.
Vendor-claimed metrics indicate adoption at scale per vendor statements, but these metrics were not independently verified in the reviewed sources.

	Robin	Envoy Workplace	Skedda
Starting Price	Custom / quote (annual billing)	Published per-active-user pricing (annual billing shown)	Published entry price (billed annually), priced per space
Suitable For	Mid-market/enterprise hybrid offices needing desk+room booking, maps, analytics	Organizations that want an integrated workplace suite with visitor/delivery options	Organizations that prefer pricing transparency and “spaces-based” scaling, including smaller to mid-size deployments
Key Strength	Provides workplace booking, mapping, and analytics in one platform	Transparent pricing, broad front-desk/visitor ecosystem, clear packaging	Transparent entry pricing, clear plan packaging, strong scheduling/space booking orientation
Key Weakness	Opaque pricing; floor plan maintenance can be resource-intensive; some reports of intermittent booking/check-in issues	Costs can scale depending on how “active user” is defined; suite bundling may limit à la carte purchases	May lack some higher-end enterprise workplace strategy features compared to more comprehensive suites; space-based pricing can increase with many resources