RS Metrics

Name: RS Metrics
Brand: RS Metrics

RS Metrics is the market-leading company for geospatial asset-level Environmental, Climate, and Physical Risk metrics

Est 2009|Valuation $14.5M|Raised $27.2M|12 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Website|FTEs 42|HQ 700 Canal St., Stamford, Connecticut 06902, United States

MarketsAlternative Data Providers & Aggregators ESG & Sustainability Investment Analytics

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Areas where the vendor’s product focus aligns: asset-level biodiversity indicators and ownership-mapped geospatial datasets, and cloud-distributed data offerings. - Areas where incumbents may have advantages: scale of assets covered, longer market presence, and more extensive published methodology and governance materials. - Market context: ESG and climate data markets continue to exhibit methodology divergence and rating disagreement. Buyers should treat any single provider’s outputs as one input among others and validate its alignment with internal models and governance standards.

	RS Metrics (ESGSignals / AssetTracker)	S&P Global Sustainable1 (Physical Risk)	Sustainalytics (Physical Climate Risk Metrics)
Starting Price	Published examples include marketplace-style listings and academic package examples; pricing is presented under multiple delivery models and may include usage fees and record limits.	Enterprise pricing typically by quote; public pages do not list standard subscription prices.	Enterprise pricing typically by quote; public pages do not list standard subscription prices.
Primary use cases	Teams requiring asset-level geospatial environmental and biodiversity metrics with ownership mapping and cloud distribution options.	Organizations seeking company and asset-level physical risk exposure and financial impact modeling at scale.	Investors seeking asset-level climate physical risk metrics with scenario analysis and broad coverage.
Key strength	Asset-level geospatial measurements and ownership mapping; distribution through cloud marketplace channels.	Large asset coverage and physical hazard modeling integrated with financial impact frameworks.	Broad asset coverage and investor-oriented climate risk reporting.
Key weakness	Limited publicly available third-party reviews and limited public security/compliance disclosures in the material reviewed; public pricing is fragmented across delivery models.	Procurement complexity and enterprise pricing; methodology and assumptions may be proprietary.	Procurement complexity; methodology and assumptions can be complex and require strong governance.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas where the vendor’s product focus aligns: asset-level biodiversity indicators and ownership-mapped geospatial datasets, and cloud-distributed data offerings.
Areas where incumbents may have advantages: scale of assets covered, longer market presence, and more extensive published methodology and governance materials.
Market context: ESG and climate data markets continue to exhibit methodology divergence and rating disagreement. Buyers should treat any single provider’s outputs as one input among others and validate its alignment with internal models and governance standards.

	RS Metrics (ESGSignals / AssetTracker)	S&P Global Sustainable1 (Physical Risk)	Sustainalytics (Physical Climate Risk Metrics)
Starting Price	Published examples include marketplace-style listings and academic package examples; pricing is presented under multiple delivery models and may include usage fees and record limits.	Enterprise pricing typically by quote; public pages do not list standard subscription prices.	Enterprise pricing typically by quote; public pages do not list standard subscription prices.
Primary use cases	Teams requiring asset-level geospatial environmental and biodiversity metrics with ownership mapping and cloud distribution options.	Organizations seeking company and asset-level physical risk exposure and financial impact modeling at scale.	Investors seeking asset-level climate physical risk metrics with scenario analysis and broad coverage.
Key strength	Asset-level geospatial measurements and ownership mapping; distribution through cloud marketplace channels.	Large asset coverage and physical hazard modeling integrated with financial impact frameworks.	Broad asset coverage and investor-oriented climate risk reporting.
Key weakness	Limited publicly available third-party reviews and limited public security/compliance disclosures in the material reviewed; public pricing is fragmented across delivery models.	Procurement complexity and enterprise pricing; methodology and assumptions may be proprietary.	Procurement complexity; methodology and assumptions can be complex and require strong governance.