RunTitle Data
AI NativeMineral rights and oil and gas property ownership information
Est 2022|Valuation $28.1M|Raised $12M
Published Jun 25, 2026
No public roadmap items with dates were located during this research.
RunTitle Data / RunTitle does not appear to have meaningful coverage on mainstream B2B software review platforms (G2, TrustRadius) based on common searches. A RunTitle product page with reviews was not located during this research.
Therefore, direct customer quotes about the product itself are scarce in standard SaaS review channels.
From RunTitle’s positioning and historic press coverage, purchasers may select the product for:
Absent third-party product reviews, typical churn drivers in this category include:
No detailed, customer-named case studies with quantified outcomes were found in RunTitle Data's publicly accessible official content during this research.
Based on the vendor’s positioning and historical customer descriptions, likely fits include:
Decision-makers: VP Land, Land Manager, Head of Acquisitions / Minerals Portfolio Manager, Data/Analytics leaders (for dataset integration)
End users: Landmen, Title researchers, Minerals analysts, Outreach/transactions staff
Get a comprehensive analysis of RunTitle Data including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.
Download full report →Regulated enterprise procurement requires a public security posture If procurement requires publicly documented SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or an explicit public security program, the vendor appears to have limited public documentation.
A broad, integrated energy data ecosystem is required If workflows require wells, production, economics, mapping, and analytics in a single integrated platform, larger suites (e.g., Enverus) may provide better alignment.
Attorney-grade title abstracts / curative-heavy work is required For complex chains of title and curative work, services-led title research firms typically provide more defensible deliverables and clearer professional accountability.
A transparent, self-serve pricing model and immediate procurement are needed Organizations that require a credit-card SaaS purchase with published tiers may prefer vendors that provide clear public pricing.
The primary need is mineral portfolio accounting/management rather than acquisition data If the core job is owner portfolio management and revenue reconciliation, software such as MineralTracker may be a better functional fit than a primarily data/marketplace-oriented vendor.
Because product reviews are limited, employment-review content provides proxy signals for organizational maturity and culture; these are not product evaluations.
Indeed (employee review) – negative culture / transparency signal:
“It’s where frat boys go to drink on the job and play FIFA…” — employee review (Data Analyst/Data Entry Associate, Austin, TX)
“The company is about as transparent as a near‑opaque tint.” — same review
“…when it comes time to lay people off… you never know who’s out the door.” — same review
Glassdoor (employee reviews) – Glassdoor shows an overall high rating in its listings, which indicates generally positive employee sentiment in that source; this reflects internal sentiment, not customer outcomes.
Past announcements associated with an earlier financing event described the product as enabling faster access to mineral title research and supporting acquisition decisions. These claims were directional in press coverage and did not include methodology or before/after metrics.
If the vendor provides case studies privately, procurement teams should request:
RunTitle Data is presented as a mineral ownership resource focused on providing information and a marketplace for mineral and royalty assets. The site highlights three primary lines of activity:
This is a data and marketplace offering in the minerals/royalty domain: aggregating and packaging mineral ownership information and facilitating transactions.
Based on public company descriptions, the core market appears to include:
Historically, RunTitle has been described as enabling access to mineral title research to support acquisition decisions, with customers reported from small independents to publicly traded E&P firms.