_rzilient

Name: _rzilient
Brand: _rzilient
Rating: 4.3 (10 reviews)

AI Native

L'expertise IT au service de votre innovation. Une infogérance sur-mesure et sécurisée, pour couvrir tous vos besoins IT

Est 2020|Valuation $10.3M|Raised $4.4M

LinkedIn 5K|Website|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 47

MarketsIT Asset Management (ITAM)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- **Differentiators** - Rzilient combines IT asset lifecycle management, procurement/logistics, human-led support, and security/compliance assistance within a single vendor offering, which may reduce vendor management overhead for some buyers. - Messaging highlighting HR+IT reconciliation indicates a focus on joiner/mover/leaver automation rather than only endpoint tooling. - **Where competitors can excel** - NinjaOne, Action1, and Automox provide deeper endpoint patching and automation capabilities and clearer tooling-first evaluation paths. - JumpCloud offers a stronger identity fabric (SSO/MFA/device identity) with transparent pricing and trial options. - Jira Service Management provides mature ITSM workflows, approvals, SLAs, and broad ecosystem integrations for organizations prioritizing process maturity. - **Market adoption and trends** - The vendor claims "+300 customers" and "100,000 users," but independent verification is limited. - Review-platform presence is light (e.g., TrustRadius shows 0 reviews; Capterra shows 2), which could indicate early-stage growth, a European footprint with limited presence on some US-centric platforms, or a lower emphasis on review solicitation.

	rzilient	NinjaOne	JumpCloud
Starting Price	Quote-based (not publicly listed)	Publishes range: ~$3.75/device/mo at ≤50 endpoints; lower at scale	Published packages: e.g., Device Management $9/user/mo (annual)
Best For	SMB/mid-market seeking a combined platform + managed services relationship	Teams prioritizing UEM/RMM/patching with per-endpoint economics	Organizations prioritizing identity + device management + SSO/MFA
Key Strength	Consolidation: procurement + fleet management + support + compliance assistance under one provider	Mature endpoint operations: automation, scale economics, self-serve deployment	Transparent packaging, strong IAM/SSO orientation, trial availability
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; limited large-scale independent review footprint	Not a managed-services "done for you" provider by default; may require partners	Per-user pricing can become expensive; does not cover procurement/logistics and hands-on IT support

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiators
- Rzilient combines IT asset lifecycle management, procurement/logistics, human-led support, and security/compliance assistance within a single vendor offering, which may reduce vendor management overhead for some buyers.
- Messaging highlighting HR+IT reconciliation indicates a focus on joiner/mover/leaver automation rather than only endpoint tooling.
Where competitors can excel
- NinjaOne, Action1, and Automox provide deeper endpoint patching and automation capabilities and clearer tooling-first evaluation paths.
- JumpCloud offers a stronger identity fabric (SSO/MFA/device identity) with transparent pricing and trial options.
- Jira Service Management provides mature ITSM workflows, approvals, SLAs, and broad ecosystem integrations for organizations prioritizing process maturity.
Market adoption and trends
- The vendor claims "+300 customers" and "100,000 users," but independent verification is limited.
- Review-platform presence is light (e.g., TrustRadius shows 0 reviews; Capterra shows 2), which could indicate early-stage growth, a European footprint with limited presence on some US-centric platforms, or a lower emphasis on review solicitation.

	rzilient	NinjaOne	JumpCloud
Starting Price	Quote-based (not publicly listed)	Publishes range: ~$3.75/device/mo at ≤50 endpoints; lower at scale	Published packages: e.g., Device Management $9/user/mo (annual)
Best For	SMB/mid-market seeking a combined platform + managed services relationship	Teams prioritizing UEM/RMM/patching with per-endpoint economics	Organizations prioritizing identity + device management + SSO/MFA
Key Strength	Consolidation: procurement + fleet management + support + compliance assistance under one provider	Mature endpoint operations: automation, scale economics, self-serve deployment	Transparent packaging, strong IAM/SSO orientation, trial availability
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; limited large-scale independent review footprint	Not a managed-services "done for you" provider by default; may require partners	Per-user pricing can become expensive; does not cover procurement/logistics and hands-on IT support