Salesforce Heroku

Name: Salesforce Heroku
Brand: Salesforce
Rating: 4.1 (758 reviews)

Leader

We're the #1 AI CRM—where humans with agents drive customer success together.

Est 1999|Valuation $203.1B|Raised $43.2B

LinkedIn 6.7M|Website|Web traffic 78.5M|FTEs 83,334|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsApplication Hosting Platforms

Platform CoversContinuous Integration & Continuous Delivery (CI/CD)Cloud Databases

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

**Render vs Heroku** - Render publishes a direct comparison that emphasizes lower pricing for comparable resources; independent analyses vary in rigor and may omit enterprise-class features (for example, Private Spaces and Shield) that affect pricing and compliance requirements. **Fly.io vs Heroku** - Fly.io is selected in some cases when teams require more control over regions and runtime behavior than a classic PaaS offers, but without full Kubernetes operations. **AWS/Azure/GCP PaaS** - Enterprise sentiment often favors hyperscalers for governance, standardization, and broader managed services, even when developer workflows are less turnkey than Heroku. **Adoption trends (qualitative)** - Notable shifts in sentiment occurred after the free tier retirement, public incident coverage in that period, and reporting about a move to sustaining engineering.

	Salesforce Heroku	Render	Fly.io
Starting Price	Consumption-based dyno model; lower-cost plan options are available; verify current tiers on the vendor pricing pages	Published pricing; positions itself as a lower-cost alternative for some workloads; migration incentives have been offered	Usage-based metering with bandwidth considerations; vendor provides a pricing calculator
Typical use case	Teams seeking a traditional PaaS developer workflow with Salesforce integration options	Teams seeking a Heroku-like developer workflow with a focus on cost efficiency and modern features	Teams seeking regional deployment control and infrastructure-adjacent primitives without full Kubernetes management
Key attributes	Git-based deploy model, add-on ecosystem, Salesforce integration options	Cost-focused positioning, Git-based deployments, modern platform features	Flexible "machines" model, regional deployment capabilities, infrastructure-adjacent primitives
Key weaknesses	2026 roadmap uncertainty (reported sustaining engineering), potential higher cost at scale, platform constraints	Smaller add-on ecosystem than Heroku, still a proprietary PaaS	More operational complexity than classic Heroku; bandwidth/egress considerations

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Render vs Heroku

Render publishes a direct comparison that emphasizes lower pricing for comparable resources; independent analyses vary in rigor and may omit enterprise-class features (for example, Private Spaces and Shield) that affect pricing and compliance requirements.

Fly.io vs Heroku

Fly.io is selected in some cases when teams require more control over regions and runtime behavior than a classic PaaS offers, but without full Kubernetes operations.

AWS/Azure/GCP PaaS

Enterprise sentiment often favors hyperscalers for governance, standardization, and broader managed services, even when developer workflows are less turnkey than Heroku.

Adoption trends (qualitative)

Notable shifts in sentiment occurred after the free tier retirement, public incident coverage in that period, and reporting about a move to sustaining engineering.

	Salesforce Heroku	Render	Fly.io
Starting Price	Consumption-based dyno model; lower-cost plan options are available; verify current tiers on the vendor pricing pages	Published pricing; positions itself as a lower-cost alternative for some workloads; migration incentives have been offered	Usage-based metering with bandwidth considerations; vendor provides a pricing calculator
Typical use case	Teams seeking a traditional PaaS developer workflow with Salesforce integration options	Teams seeking a Heroku-like developer workflow with a focus on cost efficiency and modern features	Teams seeking regional deployment control and infrastructure-adjacent primitives without full Kubernetes management
Key attributes	Git-based deploy model, add-on ecosystem, Salesforce integration options	Cost-focused positioning, Git-based deployments, modern platform features	Flexible "machines" model, regional deployment capabilities, infrastructure-adjacent primitives
Key weaknesses	2026 roadmap uncertainty (reported sustaining engineering), potential higher cost at scale, platform constraints	Smaller add-on ecosystem than Heroku, still a proprietary PaaS	More operational complexity than classic Heroku; bandwidth/egress considerations