Salesforce Net Zero Cloud

Name: Salesforce Net Zero Cloud
Brand: Salesforce
Rating: 4.7 (18 reviews)

Leader

We're the #1 AI CRM—where humans with agents drive customer success together.

Est 1999|Valuation $203.1B|Raised $43.2B|1 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6.7M|Website|Web traffic 78.5M|FTEs 83,334|HQ San Francisco, California, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative: where alternatives excel

- **Microsoft Sustainability Manager:** Attractive for organizations already deep in the Power Platform/Dataverse; published pricing provides clearer entry points than the typical Salesforce quote-based approach. - **IBM Envizi:** Strong positioning for enterprise sustainability performance management with a data-volume pricing model that aligns to large datasets and many sites/suppliers. - **Workiva:** Often selected when ESG reporting must be tightly connected to financial reporting controls and disclosure workflows (board-ready reporting, audit trails, document collaboration). Workiva also has expanding carbon offerings. - **Persefoni:** Positions around carbon accounting and offers tiers that may suit teams seeking a carbon-first ledger approach.

Competitor perspectives / comparison considerations

Buyers choosing specialist carbon accounting tools sometimes prioritize depth of carbon methodology, emissions factor management, and audit-readiness over CRM/platform integration.
Buyers choosing Salesforce Net Zero Cloud frequently do so because Salesforce already serves as their operational system-of-record and they prefer to integrate ESG as another dataset within that environment.

Market adoption trends

Market demand is being driven by expanding ESG regulatory regimes (for example, CSRD expansion). Public, independently verified market share for Net Zero Cloud specifically is not readily available.

	Salesforce Net Zero Cloud	Microsoft Sustainability Manager	IBM Envizi ESG Suite
Starting Price (public/indicative)	Third-party review sites list published per-org/year indicative pricing for Starter and Growth tiers	Vendor pricing sheet lists published per-tenant/month pricing for Essentials and Premium tiers	IBM provides a pricing estimator; pricing based on data volume and add-on modules
Best For	Organizations with an existing Salesforce footprint that want ESG data integrated into CRM/platform data	Microsoft-centric organizations using Dataverse/Dynamics/Power Platform	Large enterprises needing ESG data management + flexible reporting and a strong consulting ecosystem
Key Strength	Native Salesforce platform integration; ESG reporting hub with vendor-provided reporting templates and AI-adjacent features	Tight integration with Microsoft stack; clearer published entry pricing	Scalable data-volume model; enterprise sustainability performance management focus
Key Weakness	Setup/configuration complexity; potential cost and performance concerns reported in some reviews	Can require broader Microsoft platform competence and Dataverse capacity management	Pricing complexity; implementation can be heavy and often reliant on professional services

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative: where alternatives excel

Microsoft Sustainability Manager: Attractive for organizations already deep in the Power Platform/Dataverse; published pricing provides clearer entry points than the typical Salesforce quote-based approach.
IBM Envizi: Strong positioning for enterprise sustainability performance management with a data-volume pricing model that aligns to large datasets and many sites/suppliers.
Workiva: Often selected when ESG reporting must be tightly connected to financial reporting controls and disclosure workflows (board-ready reporting, audit trails, document collaboration). Workiva also has expanding carbon offerings.
Persefoni: Positions around carbon accounting and offers tiers that may suit teams seeking a carbon-first ledger approach.

Competitor perspectives / comparison considerations

Buyers choosing specialist carbon accounting tools sometimes prioritize depth of carbon methodology, emissions factor management, and audit-readiness over CRM/platform integration.
Buyers choosing Salesforce Net Zero Cloud frequently do so because Salesforce already serves as their operational system-of-record and they prefer to integrate ESG as another dataset within that environment.

Market adoption trends

Market demand is being driven by expanding ESG regulatory regimes (for example, CSRD expansion). Public, independently verified market share for Net Zero Cloud specifically is not readily available.

	Salesforce Net Zero Cloud	Microsoft Sustainability Manager	IBM Envizi ESG Suite
Starting Price (public/indicative)	Third-party review sites list published per-org/year indicative pricing for Starter and Growth tiers	Vendor pricing sheet lists published per-tenant/month pricing for Essentials and Premium tiers	IBM provides a pricing estimator; pricing based on data volume and add-on modules
Best For	Organizations with an existing Salesforce footprint that want ESG data integrated into CRM/platform data	Microsoft-centric organizations using Dataverse/Dynamics/Power Platform	Large enterprises needing ESG data management + flexible reporting and a strong consulting ecosystem
Key Strength	Native Salesforce platform integration; ESG reporting hub with vendor-provided reporting templates and AI-adjacent features	Tight integration with Microsoft stack; clearer published entry pricing	Scalable data-volume model; enterprise sustainability performance management focus
Key Weakness	Setup/configuration complexity; potential cost and performance concerns reported in some reviews	Can require broader Microsoft platform competence and Dataverse capacity management	Pricing complexity; implementation can be heavy and often reliant on professional services

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative: where alternatives excel

Competitor perspectives / comparison considerations

Market adoption trends

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative: where alternatives excel

Competitor perspectives / comparison considerations

Market adoption trends

02Market Map