Salesforce CPQ

Name: Salesforce CPQ
Brand: Salesforce
Rating: 4.2 (1874 reviews)

Leader

We're the #1 AI CRM—where humans with agents drive customer success together.

Est 1999|Valuation $203.1B|Raised $43.2B|150 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6.7M|Website|Web traffic 78.5M|FTEs 83,334|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsCPQ Software (Configure, Price, Quote)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Salesforce CPQ vs Oracle CPQ - Oracle CPQ is positioned for enterprise customers with a focus on flexible pricing models and suite integration; third-party comparisons generally indicate higher per-user cost for Oracle in many scenarios, though exact figures depend on vendor quotes and deployment details. Salesforce CPQ vs DealHub CPQ - Some comparison sources suggest Salesforce CPQ implementations can incur ongoing implementation costs for customizations and add-on licenses, while DealHub emphasizes more bundled workflows and positioned faster deployment; buyers should validate these claims with reference customers and requirement-driven demos. Salesforce CPQ vs Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus) - Independent analyses indicate Conga may provide strong subscription management and pricing depth in some use cases, while also reporting performance considerations; architecture differences and integration trade-offs matter for forecasting and data model simplicity. Market adoption signals - Third-party articles and category pages indicate a strong market presence and review volume for Salesforce CPQ/Revenue Cloud, but methodology and definitions across sources vary and should be interpreted as directional.

	Salesforce CPQ	Oracle CPQ	DealHub CPQ
Starting Price	Per-user pricing (annual billing; additional tiers may exist)	Typically quoted via sales; reported pricing varies and is often higher per user	Typically quoted via sales; public figures vary and should be confirmed
Typical fit	Organizations standardized on Salesforce Sales Cloud needing rule-based quoting and CRM integration	Large enterprises requiring deep pricing models and integration with Oracle suites	Teams prioritizing faster deployment and guided selling with bundled document workflows
Key Strength	Alignment with Salesforce CRM, integrated data model, and access to Salesforce enablement resources	Flexible enterprise pricing models and integration with Oracle enterprise applications	Emphasis on quicker deployment and bundled quoting/document workflows
Key Weakness	Reported implementation complexity, administration overhead, and performance issues in certain heavy-use scenarios	Potentially higher cost and complexity for non-Oracle stacks	Integration depth and native Salesforce object alignment vary depending on use case

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Salesforce CPQ vs Oracle CPQ

Oracle CPQ is positioned for enterprise customers with a focus on flexible pricing models and suite integration; third-party comparisons generally indicate higher per-user cost for Oracle in many scenarios, though exact figures depend on vendor quotes and deployment details.

Salesforce CPQ vs DealHub CPQ

Some comparison sources suggest Salesforce CPQ implementations can incur ongoing implementation costs for customizations and add-on licenses, while DealHub emphasizes more bundled workflows and positioned faster deployment; buyers should validate these claims with reference customers and requirement-driven demos.

Salesforce CPQ vs Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus)

Independent analyses indicate Conga may provide strong subscription management and pricing depth in some use cases, while also reporting performance considerations; architecture differences and integration trade-offs matter for forecasting and data model simplicity.

Market adoption signals

Third-party articles and category pages indicate a strong market presence and review volume for Salesforce CPQ/Revenue Cloud, but methodology and definitions across sources vary and should be interpreted as directional.

	Salesforce CPQ	Oracle CPQ	DealHub CPQ
Starting Price	Per-user pricing (annual billing; additional tiers may exist)	Typically quoted via sales; reported pricing varies and is often higher per user	Typically quoted via sales; public figures vary and should be confirmed
Typical fit	Organizations standardized on Salesforce Sales Cloud needing rule-based quoting and CRM integration	Large enterprises requiring deep pricing models and integration with Oracle suites	Teams prioritizing faster deployment and guided selling with bundled document workflows
Key Strength	Alignment with Salesforce CRM, integrated data model, and access to Salesforce enablement resources	Flexible enterprise pricing models and integration with Oracle enterprise applications	Emphasis on quicker deployment and bundled quoting/document workflows
Key Weakness	Reported implementation complexity, administration overhead, and performance issues in certain heavy-use scenarios	Potentially higher cost and complexity for non-Oracle stacks	Integration depth and native Salesforce object alignment vary depending on use case