Same

Name: Same
Brand: Same
Rating: 2.4 (10 reviews)

AI Native

Build fullstack web apps by prompting (YC W24)

Est 2021|Raised $14.1M

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 187K|FTEs 64|HQ US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Strengths (areas where Same provides capabilities): - A direct prompt-to-code-to-deploy loop aligned with Next.js defaults. - UI cloning from a URL/image is presented as a notable feature for landing pages and rapid mock replication. - GitHub integration is documented, which can support code export and alternative deployment strategies. - Areas where alternatives may be stronger: - Lovable more explicitly documents team and administrative controls (roles/permissions, SSO on Business, SCIM/audit logs on Enterprise) and custom domain support. - Bolt.new has high visibility in the builder community; buyer risks include unclear or variable costs due to token models (based on community posts). - Cursor and Replit may be preferable for teams that want to remain in traditional developer environments and limit platform lock-in. - Adoption signals: - Community discussion suggests Same participates in the broader agentic app-building ecosystem (for example, creating databases via agent workflows).

	Same	Lovable	Bolt.new
Starting Price	Free tier with a published usage quota; published entry-level subscription pricing available from the vendor	Free tier; published mid-tier subscription pricing available from the vendor	Pricing summaries in community sources indicate variable models; official pricing should be verified
Primary use case	Rapid web app prototyping; UI cloning; prompt-driven iteration	Team collaboration; role-based access; custom domains; enterprise-focused features	Prompt-to-app building with community visibility; cost models vary
Key Strength	Next.js-based web app generation; GitHub sync; deploy flow	Tiers that enumerate team/admin features and enterprise controls	High visibility in builder communities and fast UI generation in some workflows
Key Weakness	User reviews cite instability, missing backend support, and high token consumption risk	Community posts cite pricing/credits concerns for some users	Community complaints about token economics and variability in output quality

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Strengths (areas where Same provides capabilities):
- A direct prompt-to-code-to-deploy loop aligned with Next.js defaults.
- UI cloning from a URL/image is presented as a notable feature for landing pages and rapid mock replication.
- GitHub integration is documented, which can support code export and alternative deployment strategies.
Areas where alternatives may be stronger:
- Lovable more explicitly documents team and administrative controls (roles/permissions, SSO on Business, SCIM/audit logs on Enterprise) and custom domain support.
- Bolt.new has high visibility in the builder community; buyer risks include unclear or variable costs due to token models (based on community posts).
- Cursor and Replit may be preferable for teams that want to remain in traditional developer environments and limit platform lock-in.
Adoption signals:
- Community discussion suggests Same participates in the broader agentic app-building ecosystem (for example, creating databases via agent workflows).

	Same	Lovable	Bolt.new
Starting Price	Free tier with a published usage quota; published entry-level subscription pricing available from the vendor	Free tier; published mid-tier subscription pricing available from the vendor	Pricing summaries in community sources indicate variable models; official pricing should be verified
Primary use case	Rapid web app prototyping; UI cloning; prompt-driven iteration	Team collaboration; role-based access; custom domains; enterprise-focused features	Prompt-to-app building with community visibility; cost models vary
Key Strength	Next.js-based web app generation; GitHub sync; deploy flow	Tiers that enumerate team/admin features and enterprise controls	High visibility in builder communities and fast UI generation in some workflows
Key Weakness	User reviews cite instability, missing backend support, and high token consumption risk	Community posts cite pricing/credits concerns for some users	Community complaints about token economics and variability in output quality

Same

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map