SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking

Name: SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking
Brand: SAP
Rating: 4.1 (1174 reviews)

Leader

We bring out the best in every business.

Est 1972|Valuation $260.3B|Raised $495.9M

LinkedIn 180K|Website|Web traffic 12.5M|FTEs 2,432|HQ Walldorf, Germany

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitor comparison (indicative, not definitive) | Aspect | SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking | Workday Time Tracking | UKG (Ready / Pro WFM / Dimensions) | |--------|----------------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------| | Starting price | Quote-based; public list pricing generally not published; some public procurement listings show context-specific pricing details | Generally quote-based; some public procurement price lists exist but not broadly published | Typically quote-based; indicative ranges appear in analyst/blog content; varies by edition | | Most suitable for | Enterprises using SuccessFactors Employee Central needing advanced attendance capture and rule valuation | Workday-native HCM customers wanting unified time within Workday | Organizations where workforce management/timekeeping depth is primary (especially scheduling + timekeeping) | | Key strength | Alignment with SuccessFactors Employee Central and SAP ecosystem; multiple capture channels; time valuation trace/alerts/warnings | Unified data model inside Workday HCM; consistent security and object model | Depth of workforce management functionality (timekeeping + scheduling) | | Key weakness | Complexity and cost; mobile/desktop parity complaints; reliance on correct configuration and partner implementation | Pricing opacity; complexity depending on tenant design and reporting needs | Implementation effort and potential cost at scale | Competitor notes & evidence points (non-exhaustive): - SAP documents multi-channel time capture, including a mobile punch clock and external terminal integration. (Official vendor announcement and product overview) - PeerSpot comparisons frame UKG as strong in workforce management and payroll integration—PeerSpot is an aggregator and should be interpreted with caution. (Peer review and aggregator comparison page) - Analyst and buyer guide content position SAP SuccessFactors among recognized vendors for workforce management customer experience categories (methodologies and context vary). (Analyst and buyer guide content) Pricing comparison (evidence-based notes): - Public procurement documents sometimes contain line-item per-employee fees for competing solutions; these are context-specific to those deals and not universal. (examples in the Sources section) Why organizations choose SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking vs alternatives (inferred from sources): - Existing SAP/SuccessFactors footprint (suite consolidation), global HR alignment, and need for sophisticated time valuation behaviors. (Vendor announcement and product overview) Why organizations might choose competitors instead (common patterns): - UKG when timekeeping/scheduling depth and WFM specialization are primary buying drivers. - Workday when the organization standardizes on Workday HCM and prefers transactions within that platform. - ADP for organizations prioritizing bundled payroll + time for U.S.-centric mid-market needs. Sources: - Official vendor documentation and product announcements - Public procurement and government contract listings - Peer review and aggregator comparison pages - Analyst and buyer guide reports - Industry forums, community discussions, and buyer feedback summaries

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitor comparison (indicative, not definitive)

Aspect	SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking	Workday Time Tracking	UKG (Ready / Pro WFM / Dimensions)
Starting price	Quote-based; public list pricing generally not published; some public procurement listings show context-specific pricing details	Generally quote-based; some public procurement price lists exist but not broadly published	Typically quote-based; indicative ranges appear in analyst/blog content; varies by edition
Most suitable for	Enterprises using SuccessFactors Employee Central needing advanced attendance capture and rule valuation	Workday-native HCM customers wanting unified time within Workday	Organizations where workforce management/timekeeping depth is primary (especially scheduling + timekeeping)
Key strength	Alignment with SuccessFactors Employee Central and SAP ecosystem; multiple capture channels; time valuation trace/alerts/warnings	Unified data model inside Workday HCM; consistent security and object model	Depth of workforce management functionality (timekeeping + scheduling)
Key weakness	Complexity and cost; mobile/desktop parity complaints; reliance on correct configuration and partner implementation	Pricing opacity; complexity depending on tenant design and reporting needs	Implementation effort and potential cost at scale

Competitor notes & evidence points (non-exhaustive):

SAP documents multi-channel time capture, including a mobile punch clock and external terminal integration. (Official vendor announcement and product overview)
PeerSpot comparisons frame UKG as strong in workforce management and payroll integration—PeerSpot is an aggregator and should be interpreted with caution. (Peer review and aggregator comparison page)
Analyst and buyer guide content position SAP SuccessFactors among recognized vendors for workforce management customer experience categories (methodologies and context vary). (Analyst and buyer guide content)

Pricing comparison (evidence-based notes):

Public procurement documents sometimes contain line-item per-employee fees for competing solutions; these are context-specific to those deals and not universal. (examples in the Sources section)

Why organizations choose SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking vs alternatives (inferred from sources):

Existing SAP/SuccessFactors footprint (suite consolidation), global HR alignment, and need for sophisticated time valuation behaviors. (Vendor announcement and product overview)

Why organizations might choose competitors instead (common patterns):

UKG when timekeeping/scheduling depth and WFM specialization are primary buying drivers.
Workday when the organization standardizes on Workday HCM and prefers transactions within that platform.
ADP for organizations prioritizing bundled payroll + time for U.S.-centric mid-market needs.

Sources:

Official vendor documentation and product announcements
Public procurement and government contract listings
Peer review and aggregator comparison pages
Analyst and buyer guide reports
Industry forums, community discussions, and buyer feedback summaries

Aspect

SAP SuccessFactors Time Tracking

Workday Time Tracking

UKG (Ready / Pro WFM / Dimensions)

Starting price

Quote-based; public list pricing generally not published; some public procurement listings show context-specific pricing details

Generally quote-based; some public procurement price lists exist but not broadly published

Typically quote-based; indicative ranges appear in analyst/blog content; varies by edition

Most suitable for

Enterprises using SuccessFactors Employee Central needing advanced attendance capture and rule valuation

Workday-native HCM customers wanting unified time within Workday

Organizations where workforce management/timekeeping depth is primary (especially scheduling + timekeeping)

Key strength

Alignment with SuccessFactors Employee Central and SAP ecosystem; multiple capture channels; time valuation trace/alerts/warnings

Unified data model inside Workday HCM; consistent security and object model

Depth of workforce management functionality (timekeeping + scheduling)

Key weakness

Complexity and cost; mobile/desktop parity complaints; reliance on correct configuration and partner implementation

Pricing opacity; complexity depending on tenant design and reporting needs

Implementation effort and potential cost at scale