Scan.com

| Aspect | Scan.com | One Call (vendor website) | RadNet (vendor website) | |--------|----------|--------------------------|---------------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed for B2B; consumer self-pay MRI pricing is published on the consumer-facing site | Not publicly listed | Not publicly listed (varies by payer/location; provider-based pricing) | | Best For | Payers/employers/TPAs/digital health platforms needing a routing, scheduling, and reporting layer across multiple independent imaging centers via an API | Workers’ comp and ancillary care coordination programs (including imaging) | Patients/payers/providers seeking services delivered through a large owned/operator outpatient imaging footprint | | Key Strength | Single integration layer and API primitives for search/order/report; centralized contract positioning; routing before booking and scheduling integration with partner centers | Focused on workers’ comp ancillary coordination and payer operations; established field operations | Direct control of imaging operations and capacity as an operator; broad modality availability in owned centers | | Key Weakness | Many outcome/scale metrics are vendor-reported without independent public verification; SOC 2 and other compliance artifacts are not publicly scoped; effectiveness depends on network coverage and integration depth | More traditional coordination model; may be less API-first and developer-centric | Limited to owned footprint; not a neutral marketplace optimizing across independent centers | - Narrative analysis - Scan.com vs UM/PA incumbents (Carelon, EviCore) - Carelon and EviCore primarily provide utilization management and prior authorization services with guideline-driven clinical review; noncompliance with those programs can carry claim denial risk. The vendor positions itself as complementary to existing UM/PA processes rather than a replacement, which implies buyers may require both UM/PA and routing capabilities to meet clinical and operational goals. - Buyer implication: Plans may need both a utilization management program for medical necessity determinations and a routing/scheduling network to operationalize steerage and improve member scheduling experience. - Scan.com vs imaging operators (RadNet, SimonMed) - Operator companies control capacity, staffing, and on-site operations and therefore can directly influence patient experience and throughput. A network intermediary may not have the same level of operational control over partner sites and therefore may face variability across sites. - Market share and adoption trends - The vendor reports network size and monthly scan volumes as well as a reported annualized run rate. Independent market share data was not identified in this research session.