Scoro

Name: Scoro
Brand: Scoro
Rating: 4.5 (773 reviews)

Professional services automation (PSA) software for agencies, consultancies, and other service businesses.

Est 2013|Raised $23.5M|57 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 15K|Web traffic 525K|FTEs 144|HQ London, England, GB

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitors comparison (indicative)

| Aspect | Scoro | Productive | monday.com (Work Management) | |---|---:|---:|---:| | Starting Price (publicly listed) | Not consistently clear globally; marketed with "starting from" language; may require a minimum seat commitment | Published tiered plans with vendor-disclosed per-user pricing | Published per-seat and bundle pricing available from the vendor | | Best suited for | Agencies/consultancies wanting CRM → projects → time → invoicing in a single platform | Agencies wanting strong project financials and resourcing with clear pricing | Teams wanting flexible work management/CRM-lite, automation, and broad adoption | | Key Strength | Integrated PSA breadth (delivery + financial control) and consolidation of workflows | Transparent pricing; modern UI; agency operations focus | Flexible boards/workflows; broad ecosystem; faster adoption | | Key Weakness | Setup complexity; price considerations; CRM depth vs best-of-breed; reporting rigidity noted in reviews | May require add-ons/structure for complex finance; capabilities vary by plan | Not a full PSA by default; may need integrations/apps to cover invoicing/profitability |

Narrative competitive analysis

Scoro vs Productive

Productive publishes clear pricing tiers (a buyer-friendly signal) and emphasizes agency operations, resourcing and profitability.
Scoro differentiates by integrating quoting and invoicing workflows with delivery and finance functions.

Scoro vs Kantata (Mavenlink/Kimble)

Kantata positions for mid-market/enterprise PSA and is often considered enterprise-grade; pricing is typically provided on request.
Scoro may be perceived as a broader business operations platform (CRM + delivery + finance) but may be less entrenched as a pure enterprise PSA standard.

Scoro vs monday.com

monday.com is frequently adopted for general work management with faster time-to-value and a large integration ecosystem; pricing and packaging are clearly published.
Scoro is more focused on embedded PSA-style financial management (time, budgets, invoicing) within delivery workflows rather than as separate add-ons.

Market share and adoption trends

Analyst and review-grid framing (e.g., vendor positioned as a high performer with more modest market presence) suggests Scoro may have solid user satisfaction relative to its presence in some categories, but not the broad market reach of major incumbents.

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitors comparison (indicative)

Aspect	Scoro	Productive	monday.com (Work Management)
Starting Price (publicly listed)	Not consistently clear globally; marketed with "starting from" language; may require a minimum seat commitment	Published tiered plans with vendor-disclosed per-user pricing	Published per-seat and bundle pricing available from the vendor
Best suited for	Agencies/consultancies wanting CRM → projects → time → invoicing in a single platform	Agencies wanting strong project financials and resourcing with clear pricing	Teams wanting flexible work management/CRM-lite, automation, and broad adoption
Key Strength	Integrated PSA breadth (delivery + financial control) and consolidation of workflows	Transparent pricing; modern UI; agency operations focus	Flexible boards/workflows; broad ecosystem; faster adoption
Key Weakness	Setup complexity; price considerations; CRM depth vs best-of-breed; reporting rigidity noted in reviews	May require add-ons/structure for complex finance; capabilities vary by plan	Not a full PSA by default; may need integrations/apps to cover invoicing/profitability

Narrative competitive analysis

Scoro vs Productive

Productive publishes clear pricing tiers (a buyer-friendly signal) and emphasizes agency operations, resourcing and profitability.
Scoro differentiates by integrating quoting and invoicing workflows with delivery and finance functions.

Scoro vs Kantata (Mavenlink/Kimble)

Kantata positions for mid-market/enterprise PSA and is often considered enterprise-grade; pricing is typically provided on request.
Scoro may be perceived as a broader business operations platform (CRM + delivery + finance) but may be less entrenched as a pure enterprise PSA standard.

Scoro vs monday.com

monday.com is frequently adopted for general work management with faster time-to-value and a large integration ecosystem; pricing and packaging are clearly published.
Scoro is more focused on embedded PSA-style financial management (time, budgets, invoicing) within delivery workflows rather than as separate add-ons.

Market share and adoption trends

Analyst and review-grid framing (e.g., vendor positioned as a high performer with more modest market presence) suggests Scoro may have solid user satisfaction relative to its presence in some categories, but not the broad market reach of major incumbents.

Scoro

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitors comparison (indicative)

Narrative competitive analysis

Market share and adoption trends

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitors comparison (indicative)

Narrative competitive analysis

Market share and adoption trends

02Market Map