Shareablee

Name: Shareablee
Brand: Shareablee

Acquired by Comscore, a leader in audience-based social media measurement for media publishers, agencies and brands.

Est 2013|Valuation $45M|Raised $12M|17 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 56|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsSocial Listening & Consumer Intelligence

Published Oct 14, 2026

01Common complaints

- Small teams or small and medium-sized businesses that primarily need publishing and basic analytics: Shareablee may be heavier and less cost-effective than tools like Hootsuite or Sprout Social. - Organizations prioritizing broad web listening and sentiment analysis: listening-focused vendors may provide broader coverage and workflows. - Teams requiring an integrated content workflow with calendar, approvals, and unified inbox: full-suite vendors tend to be stronger in operational workflows. - Highly regulated enterprises that require publicly documented SOC 2/ISO certifications or detailed security whitepapers: public security documentation for Shareablee appears limited. - Data teams expecting to store API data long-term: the API terms specify a 30-day storage limit unless explicitly approved.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require an all-in-one tool with content calendar, approvals, and community management.
Organizations that require publicly documented security certifications (SOC 2/ISO) for vendor risk acceptance.
Data engineering teams needing to store API-derived raw data long-term (API retention constraints may be limiting).

Vendor-acknowledged / contractually implied limitations

Service terms indicate the service is subject to change at Comscore’s discretion.
API limitations:
- Rate limiting (e.g., 5 requests per second per token/IP)
- Restrictions on storing personal data
- Data storage limited to 30 days unless approved
- Prohibitions on API use by direct competitors or for reselling metrics access

Roadmap / future features

No clear public roadmap or dated feature timeline was found in the reviewed sources.

Scale limitations

Not publicly documented; user feedback indicates that the volume of data and the interface may present practical limitations for some users.

02Why they buy

Validated or partially validated by reviews and third-party mentions: - Depth in competitive benchmarking (noted in multiple review excerpts) - Perceived data accuracy and reliability relative to some peer tools (review feedback) - Vendor claims of scale (20M+ entities, 70+ markets) appear in Comscore/press materials; methodologies and independent validation were not available in the sources reviewed. Areas where competitors have an edge: - Integrated publishing workflows (content calendar, approvals, unified inbox) - Broader listening and media monitoring breadth - More transparent public pricing for some competitors

Why customers chose Shareablee (themes)

From review excerpts and product positioning:

Competitive benchmarking depth (category and competitor landscape in one place)
Perceived data accuracy and reliability
Cross-platform analytics and content surfacing

03Field reports

Review platform signal (G2)

- Very highly rated on G2. Positive quotes (G2): - "We couldn’t do without Shareablee - you get so much all in one platform. It’s particularly strong for surfacing content on a particular subject." - "The metrics that you can get are trustful and meaningful." Negative / cautionary quotes (G2): - "The interface isn’t the best, the charts don’t look great and generally you have to export everything and re-chart it." - "The interface could be a little confusing at first." - "Too much data at times…"

Non-G2 review sources (Trustpilot, Sitejabber) — more negative

These sources contain only a very small number of reviews and may not represent the broader customer base, but they provide more critical perspectives. Trustpilot (very small sample): - Comments included claims that the tool provides irrelevant data and excessive metrics, and that API integrations and data extraction are complicated. One review referenced communication issues with customer service. Sitejabber (very small sample): - One review focused on company leadership behavior rather than product functionality; useful for vendor risk perception rather than product performance.

Why some customers might leave / churn reasons (inferred from complaints)

Direct vendor-switch narratives were not prominent in accessible sources. Likely churn drivers include:

Need for publishing and workflow capabilities (content calendar, engagement inbox)
UI and reporting friction (requirement to export and re-chart)
Complexity or metric overload leading to analysis challenges

Deal-breakers / reasons customers didn’t purchase

Not explicitly documented in the sources reviewed. Enterprise buyers commonly cite:

Lack of transparent pricing
Onboarding and learning curve concerns
Gaps versus integrated suites (publishing, listening breadth, workflow)

Availability of case studies

Shareablee’s Resources page lists case studies, but multiple listed links were inaccessible during research, limiting independent verification.

Example case study evidence found (limited)

The Resources page references case studies covering topics such as social performance in consumer electronics and social impact in media publishing, but the underlying pages were not accessible during the review.

Critical evaluation

With inaccessible case study content, quantified outcomes (ROI, lifts, engagement increases attributable to Shareablee use) could not be validated.
Vendor press materials reference large clients and enterprise deployments, but these references do not include implementation detail, methodology, or measurable business impact attributable solely to Shareablee.

04Best fit

Company size

Most likely fit: mid-market to enterprise where social measurement is a formalized function.

Industries / verticals

Media and publishing
Consumer packaged goods (CPG) and large consumer brands
Agencies (media, creative, social)
Entertainment and sports media

Roles and personas

Social insights and social analytics leads
Brand strategy and consumer insights teams
Agency reporting teams
Marketing science and measurement teams
Executives requesting standardized competitive dashboards, typically supported by analysts

Pain points the product addresses

Understanding performance relative to competitors across platforms
Measuring social impact, particularly for video
Tracking category norms and surfacing content themes

Qualification criteria (great fit)

The buyer already has social publishing and engagement workflows covered and seeks specialized measurement and benchmarking capabilities.
The organization needs repeatable competitive reporting and exportable datasets.
The organization can support a learning curve and has analysts who can operationalize dashboards and exported data.

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

Shareablee is a social media analytics and audience intelligence / competitive benchmarking platform focused on measuring and comparing cross-platform social performance for brands, publishers, and creators. The product emphasizes large-scale social measurement (including video) and competitive context—benchmarking accounts and content against peers, categories, or competitors—rather than providing a full social media management suite. Shareablee operates within Comscore’s product ecosystem following its acquisition; service terms are presented as Comscore "Shareablee" products/services.

Target market and positioning

Primary fit segments (based on product positioning and customer examples): - Enterprise brands and media companies needing cross-platform social measurement, particularly for social video analytics - Agencies performing competitive benchmarking and reporting at scale - Research and insights teams producing category benchmarking and "state of social" reporting Positioning cues: - G2 categorizes the product under Social Media Analytics and notes competitor analysis and reporting depth. - Shareablee’s marketing materials emphasize measuring cultural signals and trends to inform social strategy and authenticity.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Shareablee including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →

Published Oct 14, 2026

01Common complaints

Small teams or small and medium-sized businesses that primarily need publishing and basic analytics: Shareablee may be heavier and less cost-effective than tools like Hootsuite or Sprout Social.
Organizations prioritizing broad web listening and sentiment analysis: listening-focused vendors may provide broader coverage and workflows.
Teams requiring an integrated content workflow with calendar, approvals, and unified inbox: full-suite vendors tend to be stronger in operational workflows.
Highly regulated enterprises that require publicly documented SOC 2/ISO certifications or detailed security whitepapers: public security documentation for Shareablee appears limited.
Data teams expecting to store API data long-term: the API terms specify a 30-day storage limit unless explicitly approved.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require an all-in-one tool with content calendar, approvals, and community management.
Organizations that require publicly documented security certifications (SOC 2/ISO) for vendor risk acceptance.
Data engineering teams needing to store API-derived raw data long-term (API retention constraints may be limiting).

Vendor-acknowledged / contractually implied limitations

Service terms indicate the service is subject to change at Comscore’s discretion.
API limitations:
- Rate limiting (e.g., 5 requests per second per token/IP)
- Restrictions on storing personal data
- Data storage limited to 30 days unless approved
- Prohibitions on API use by direct competitors or for reselling metrics access

Roadmap / future features

No clear public roadmap or dated feature timeline was found in the reviewed sources.

Scale limitations

Not publicly documented; user feedback indicates that the volume of data and the interface may present practical limitations for some users.

02Why they buy

Validated or partially validated by reviews and third-party mentions:

Depth in competitive benchmarking (noted in multiple review excerpts)
Perceived data accuracy and reliability relative to some peer tools (review feedback)
Vendor claims of scale (20M+ entities, 70+ markets) appear in Comscore/press materials; methodologies and independent validation were not available in the sources reviewed.

Areas where competitors have an edge:

Integrated publishing workflows (content calendar, approvals, unified inbox)
Broader listening and media monitoring breadth
More transparent public pricing for some competitors

Why customers chose Shareablee (themes)

From review excerpts and product positioning:

Competitive benchmarking depth (category and competitor landscape in one place)
Perceived data accuracy and reliability
Cross-platform analytics and content surfacing

03Field reports

Review platform signal (G2)

Very highly rated on G2.

Positive quotes (G2):

"We couldn’t do without Shareablee - you get so much all in one platform. It’s particularly strong for surfacing content on a particular subject."
"The metrics that you can get are trustful and meaningful."

Negative / cautionary quotes (G2):

"The interface isn’t the best, the charts don’t look great and generally you have to export everything and re-chart it."
"The interface could be a little confusing at first."
"Too much data at times…"

Non-G2 review sources (Trustpilot, Sitejabber) — more negative

These sources contain only a very small number of reviews and may not represent the broader customer base, but they provide more critical perspectives.

Trustpilot (very small sample):

Comments included claims that the tool provides irrelevant data and excessive metrics, and that API integrations and data extraction are complicated. One review referenced communication issues with customer service.

Sitejabber (very small sample):

One review focused on company leadership behavior rather than product functionality; useful for vendor risk perception rather than product performance.

Why some customers might leave / churn reasons (inferred from complaints)

Direct vendor-switch narratives were not prominent in accessible sources. Likely churn drivers include:

Need for publishing and workflow capabilities (content calendar, engagement inbox)
UI and reporting friction (requirement to export and re-chart)
Complexity or metric overload leading to analysis challenges

Deal-breakers / reasons customers didn’t purchase

Not explicitly documented in the sources reviewed. Enterprise buyers commonly cite:

Lack of transparent pricing
Onboarding and learning curve concerns
Gaps versus integrated suites (publishing, listening breadth, workflow)

Availability of case studies

Shareablee’s Resources page lists case studies, but multiple listed links were inaccessible during research, limiting independent verification.

Example case study evidence found (limited)

The Resources page references case studies covering topics such as social performance in consumer electronics and social impact in media publishing, but the underlying pages were not accessible during the review.

Critical evaluation

With inaccessible case study content, quantified outcomes (ROI, lifts, engagement increases attributable to Shareablee use) could not be validated.
Vendor press materials reference large clients and enterprise deployments, but these references do not include implementation detail, methodology, or measurable business impact attributable solely to Shareablee.

04Best fit

Company size

Most likely fit: mid-market to enterprise where social measurement is a formalized function.

Industries / verticals

Media and publishing
Consumer packaged goods (CPG) and large consumer brands
Agencies (media, creative, social)
Entertainment and sports media

Roles and personas

Social insights and social analytics leads
Brand strategy and consumer insights teams
Agency reporting teams
Marketing science and measurement teams
Executives requesting standardized competitive dashboards, typically supported by analysts

Pain points the product addresses

Understanding performance relative to competitors across platforms
Measuring social impact, particularly for video
Tracking category norms and surfacing content themes

Qualification criteria (great fit)

The buyer already has social publishing and engagement workflows covered and seeks specialized measurement and benchmarking capabilities.
The organization needs repeatable competitive reporting and exportable datasets.
The organization can support a learning curve and has analysts who can operationalize dashboards and exported data.

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

Shareablee operates within Comscore’s product ecosystem following its acquisition; service terms are presented as Comscore "Shareablee" products/services.

Target market and positioning

Primary fit segments (based on product positioning and customer examples):

Enterprise brands and media companies needing cross-platform social measurement, particularly for social video analytics
Agencies performing competitive benchmarking and reporting at scale
Research and insights teams producing category benchmarking and "state of social" reporting

Positioning cues:

G2 categorizes the product under Social Media Analytics and notes competitor analysis and reporting depth.
Shareablee’s marketing materials emphasize measuring cultural signals and trends to inform social strategy and authenticity.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Shareablee including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →