Shippeo

Name: Shippeo
Brand: Shippeo

The most recommended real-time transportation visibility platform in the world

Est 2013|Valuation $237.5M|Raised $130.8M

LinkedIn 41K|Web traffic 51K|FTEs 230|HQ Paris, Île-de-France, FR

MarketsSupply Chain Visibility

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Shippeo vs project44

Public comparison pages and review-platform data suggest differences in feature coverage and integration approaches; these are directional indicators rather than definitive measures of relative capability.

project44 has published vendor claims about implementation speed relative to peers; these are vendor-provided comparative statements.

Shippeo vs Descartes MacroPoint

MacroPoint highlights pricing models that are clearer in public communications; Shippeo remains more sales-led and opaque on public pricing.

Market adoption / analyst coverage

Market reports and press coverage commonly include Shippeo, project44, and FourKites among vendors in the RTTVP category; vendor and market language varies between objective description and promotional framing.

Shippeo vs project44 - Public comparison pages and review-platform data suggest differences in feature coverage and integration approaches; these are directional indicators rather than definitive measures of relative capability. project44 has published vendor claims about implementation speed relative to peers; these are vendor-provided comparative statements. Shippeo vs Descartes MacroPoint - MacroPoint highlights pricing models that are clearer in public communications; Shippeo remains more sales-led and opaque on public pricing. Market adoption / analyst coverage - Market reports and press coverage commonly include Shippeo, project44, and FourKites among vendors in the RTTVP category; vendor and market language varies between objective description and promotional framing.

	Shippeo	project44	Descartes MacroPoint
Starting Price	Not publicly disclosed (sales-led)	Not publicly disclosed (sales-led)	Public guidance: start points and per-load models have been discussed by the vendor
Primary Use Cases	Enterprise shippers/3PLs seeking multimodal RTTV and EU-centric data posture	Enterprises seeking broad visibility features across multiple modes and regions	Shippers/brokers/3PLs who prefer per-load pricing models and large carrier connectivity
Key Strength	High ratings on G2/Gartner; stated ISO 27001/TISAX certifications; multimodal focus	Broad geographic and mode coverage; integrations and additional modules	Vendor-public pricing guidance in some cases; large carrier network and established presence
Key Weakness	Data latency and export completeness were noted in reviews; limited public detail on certain IAM features; EU-centric data residency may be limiting for some buyers	Breadth can add implementation complexity; pricing not always transparent	Implementation fees and recurring costs can be meaningful for some customers