Showdigs

Name: Showdigs
Brand: Showdigs
Rating: 4.5 (53 reviews)

The only all-in-one leasing software for single-family property managers.

Est 2018|Valuation $24.5M|Raised $10.5M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Web traffic 68K|FTEs 17|HQ Seattle, Washington, US

MarketsProperty Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Showdigs versus Tenant Turner: - Tenant Turner emphasizes transparent subscription pricing and supporting add-ons (lockboxes, call center). Showdigs differentiates by combining automation with a managed agent network for showings and fieldwork in select markets. - Organizations seeking a scheduling engine with tight cost control and who already have internal operations staff may find Tenant Turner more cost-efficient. - Showdigs versus Showami: - Showami operates as a showing marketplace with per-showing pricing and is not positioned as a leasing CRM. - Showdigs targets property managers with a bundled leasing workflow and optional agent-led tours. - Showdigs versus Rently: - Rently focuses on self-guided tours and hardware; pricing for property managers often requires a quote and hardware procurement. Showdigs provides a property-management-focused workflow with optional agent-led showings and fieldwork.

Market share and adoption trends

No credible public market share data was found in the collected sources.

	Showdigs	Tenant Turner	Showami
Starting Price	Low single dollars per unit per month with a contractual minimum (vendor documents present multiple minimum statements)	Low single dollars per unit per month with lower minimums	Pay-per-showing marketplace; agent-set per-showing fees varying by market (tens to several hundred dollars per showing)
Primary Use Case	Property managers seeking a leasing-ops platform plus optional outsourced fieldwork/agent network	Portfolios focused on lead response and scheduling with lockbox add-ons	Broker/agent teams needing ad hoc showing coverage (not a leasing CRM)
Key Strength	Combines scheduling CRM, self-show capabilities, and an on-demand agent network; PMS integration available	Predictable subscription pricing with lockbox and call center add-ons	Flexible pay-per-showing pricing and broad agent marketplace model
Key Weakness	Reported reporting limitations at scale; agent quality and coverage can vary; formal security attestations not publicly documented	May require hardware/add-ons for full self-tour stack; does not provide the same managed agent workforce model in all markets	Not positioned as an end-to-end property management leasing operations platform; costs can increase with higher showing volume

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Showdigs versus Tenant Turner:
- Tenant Turner emphasizes transparent subscription pricing and supporting add-ons (lockboxes, call center). Showdigs differentiates by combining automation with a managed agent network for showings and fieldwork in select markets.
- Organizations seeking a scheduling engine with tight cost control and who already have internal operations staff may find Tenant Turner more cost-efficient.
Showdigs versus Showami:
- Showami operates as a showing marketplace with per-showing pricing and is not positioned as a leasing CRM.
- Showdigs targets property managers with a bundled leasing workflow and optional agent-led tours.
Showdigs versus Rently:
- Rently focuses on self-guided tours and hardware; pricing for property managers often requires a quote and hardware procurement. Showdigs provides a property-management-focused workflow with optional agent-led showings and fieldwork.

Market share and adoption trends

No credible public market share data was found in the collected sources.

	Showdigs	Tenant Turner	Showami
Starting Price	Low single dollars per unit per month with a contractual minimum (vendor documents present multiple minimum statements)	Low single dollars per unit per month with lower minimums	Pay-per-showing marketplace; agent-set per-showing fees varying by market (tens to several hundred dollars per showing)
Primary Use Case	Property managers seeking a leasing-ops platform plus optional outsourced fieldwork/agent network	Portfolios focused on lead response and scheduling with lockbox add-ons	Broker/agent teams needing ad hoc showing coverage (not a leasing CRM)
Key Strength	Combines scheduling CRM, self-show capabilities, and an on-demand agent network; PMS integration available	Predictable subscription pricing with lockbox and call center add-ons	Flexible pay-per-showing pricing and broad agent marketplace model
Key Weakness	Reported reporting limitations at scale; agent quality and coverage can vary; formal security attestations not publicly documented	May require hardware/add-ons for full self-tour stack; does not provide the same managed agent workforce model in all markets	Not positioned as an end-to-end property management leasing operations platform; costs can increase with higher showing volume