SimpleForm, inc.

Name: SimpleForm, inc.
Brand: SimpleForm, inc.

AI Native

全ての法人がフェアに繋がれる社会の実現

Est 2020|Valuation $26.8M|Raised $33.4M

LinkedIn 141|Website|Web traffic 4K|FTEs 39|HQ Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo Metropolis, JP

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- SimpleForm vs TDB/TSR: Incumbents are established providers of corporate and credit information in Japan. SimpleForm positions itself as offering a workflow and monitoring layer that augments data with automated screening processes. Organizations that already use TDB/TSR may consider SimpleForm if it demonstrably reduces analyst effort or adds continuous monitoring capabilities. - SimpleForm vs global AML vendors: Global vendors typically provide broad sanctions/PEP/adverse media screening across multiple jurisdictions and have established audit tooling. SimpleForm appears to differentiate by focusing on Japan-specific corporate coverage and by providing integration-focused workflow tooling for screening operations.

When competitors may be preferable

If the primary need is broad international sanctions/PEP/adverse media screening with mature audit tooling, global AML suites may be more suitable.
If the requirement is for traditional credit reports accepted by credit committees and procurement frameworks, incumbents such as TDB and TSR may be simpler to justify.

	SimpleForm (SimpleCheck / SimpleMonitor)	Teikoku Databank (TDB) COSMOSNET	Tokyo Shoko Research (TSR) TSR REPORT
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (likely enterprise quote)	COSMOSNET shows service minimums and tiered fees; some entry-level access is available on a subscription basis	Pricing varies by report type and recency; fees for individual reports are commonly published or available via intermediaries
Best For	Banks and platforms that require rapid KYB checks, ongoing entity monitoring, and integration with screening workflows	Firms needing established Japanese corporate data and standard credit reporting accepted in many workflows	Organizations seeking detailed credit-investigation reports and traditional credit assessment artifacts
Key Strength	Workflow and monitoring layer; SaaS offering with integration capabilities and focus on Japanese corporate coverage	Depth and legacy coverage; widely used and accepted within Japan for credit information	Traditional credit investigation methodology; broad dataset and long-standing industry recognition
Key Weakness	Limited publicly available third-party reviews; security certifications not clearly documented publicly; pricing opacity	May require additional integration work to support modern case-management workflows	Report-based workflows can be more manual and slower compared with automated screening products

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

SimpleForm vs TDB/TSR: Incumbents are established providers of corporate and credit information in Japan. SimpleForm positions itself as offering a workflow and monitoring layer that augments data with automated screening processes. Organizations that already use TDB/TSR may consider SimpleForm if it demonstrably reduces analyst effort or adds continuous monitoring capabilities.
SimpleForm vs global AML vendors: Global vendors typically provide broad sanctions/PEP/adverse media screening across multiple jurisdictions and have established audit tooling. SimpleForm appears to differentiate by focusing on Japan-specific corporate coverage and by providing integration-focused workflow tooling for screening operations.

When competitors may be preferable

If the primary need is broad international sanctions/PEP/adverse media screening with mature audit tooling, global AML suites may be more suitable.
If the requirement is for traditional credit reports accepted by credit committees and procurement frameworks, incumbents such as TDB and TSR may be simpler to justify.

	SimpleForm (SimpleCheck / SimpleMonitor)	Teikoku Databank (TDB) COSMOSNET	Tokyo Shoko Research (TSR) TSR REPORT
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (likely enterprise quote)	COSMOSNET shows service minimums and tiered fees; some entry-level access is available on a subscription basis	Pricing varies by report type and recency; fees for individual reports are commonly published or available via intermediaries
Best For	Banks and platforms that require rapid KYB checks, ongoing entity monitoring, and integration with screening workflows	Firms needing established Japanese corporate data and standard credit reporting accepted in many workflows	Organizations seeking detailed credit-investigation reports and traditional credit assessment artifacts
Key Strength	Workflow and monitoring layer; SaaS offering with integration capabilities and focus on Japanese corporate coverage	Depth and legacy coverage; widely used and accepted within Japan for credit information	Traditional credit investigation methodology; broad dataset and long-standing industry recognition
Key Weakness	Limited publicly available third-party reviews; security certifications not clearly documented publicly; pricing opacity	May require additional integration work to support modern case-management workflows	Report-based workflows can be more manual and slower compared with automated screening products

SimpleForm, inc.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

When competitors may be preferable

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

When competitors may be preferable

02Market Map