Skello

Name: Skello
Brand: Skello

Plan your success

Est 2016|Valuation $233.5M|Raised $54.5M|49 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 30K|Web traffic 508K|FTEs 400|HQ Paris, France

MarketsHuman Resource Information Systems (HRIS)Time, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- **Areas where Skello appears to offer advantages** - Messaging and EU press coverage highlight local labor laws and collective agreements as a differentiating factor relative to some US-first tools; this can be important in France/Europe. - Skello has introduced the Skello Assistant (an AI agent) for HR/contractual queries; vendor documentation notes functional limits and potential inaccuracies. - **Where competitors may be stronger** - Deputy: clear per-user pricing, extensive WFM feature set (demand forecasting, labor optimization), and more explicit packaging of enterprise features like SSO within a defined plan. - When I Work: lower entry price and clear tiering; may be more cost-competitive for US SMBs. - Planday: strong presence in Europe/UK, API/integrations packaged above entry tier; pricing structure includes subscription fees and per-user minimums that can shift TCO depending on team size. - **Adoption trends / market presence** - Skello’s public materials assert substantial field-team and employee adoption; these are vendor claims and should be validated via references.

	Skello	Deputy	When I Work
Starting Price	Organization-based, module-dependent monthly plans	Per-user starting plans	Per-user starting plans
Primary fit	EU-based organizations needing scheduling + time + payroll prep with local rules	Multi-country hourly workforce operations with scheduling + time + compliance	Cost-sensitive SMB scheduling + communications, fast setup
Key strengths	Focus on frontline scheduling workflows; automation features (auto-planning, replacements); organization-based pricing can be cost-effective	Broad WFM feature depth (demand forecasting, labor optimization, SSO at higher tiers)	Low entry price and straightforward scheduling + messaging
Key weaknesses	Less transparent on enterprise security certifications; some mobile/performance complaints; smaller review footprint on US-centric sites	Can get pricey as users scale; prior price increases documented	Advanced enterprise controls (SSO/API) pushed to higher tiers; may lack EU labor-agreement depth vs local specialists

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas where Skello appears to offer advantages
- Messaging and EU press coverage highlight local labor laws and collective agreements as a differentiating factor relative to some US-first tools; this can be important in France/Europe.
- Skello has introduced the Skello Assistant (an AI agent) for HR/contractual queries; vendor documentation notes functional limits and potential inaccuracies.
Where competitors may be stronger
- Deputy: clear per-user pricing, extensive WFM feature set (demand forecasting, labor optimization), and more explicit packaging of enterprise features like SSO within a defined plan.
- When I Work: lower entry price and clear tiering; may be more cost-competitive for US SMBs.
- Planday: strong presence in Europe/UK, API/integrations packaged above entry tier; pricing structure includes subscription fees and per-user minimums that can shift TCO depending on team size.
Adoption trends / market presence
- Skello’s public materials assert substantial field-team and employee adoption; these are vendor claims and should be validated via references.

	Skello	Deputy	When I Work
Starting Price	Organization-based, module-dependent monthly plans	Per-user starting plans	Per-user starting plans
Primary fit	EU-based organizations needing scheduling + time + payroll prep with local rules	Multi-country hourly workforce operations with scheduling + time + compliance	Cost-sensitive SMB scheduling + communications, fast setup
Key strengths	Focus on frontline scheduling workflows; automation features (auto-planning, replacements); organization-based pricing can be cost-effective	Broad WFM feature depth (demand forecasting, labor optimization, SSO at higher tiers)	Low entry price and straightforward scheduling + messaging
Key weaknesses	Less transparent on enterprise security certifications; some mobile/performance complaints; smaller review footprint on US-centric sites	Can get pricey as users scale; prior price increases documented	Advanced enterprise controls (SSO/API) pushed to higher tiers; may lack EU labor-agreement depth vs local specialists