SlickText

Name: SlickText
Brand: SlickText
Rating: 4.8 (2090 reviews)

The #1 Rated SMS Marketing Platform

Est 2011|Raised $7.6M|38 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 197K|FTEs 42|HQ Jamestown, New York, US

MarketsSMS & Messaging

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

SlickText vs SimpleTexting - SimpleTexting highlights broader support availability and certain onboarding features, including weekend support in some configurations. - SlickText's materials indicate feature parity across plans and rollover credits; review-platform activity indicates substantial user feedback. - For organizations that require weekend operations/support, vendors that advertise broader support hours may be operationally better aligned. SlickText vs Textedly - Textedly publishes pricing and support availability information that includes broader live chat hours in some plans. - Textedly discloses add-ons and surcharges that affect total cost. SlickText vs EZ Texting - EZ Texting advertises a lower entry price but also outlines telecom fees and credit/overage structures that can affect real cost. - SlickText discloses carrier fees as pass-through charges; other vendors use different fee structures that may be simpler for budgeting but still represent additional costs.

Adoption trends / market signals

Growth signals for SlickText are largely derived from review-platform activity, vendor-reported awards, and vendor-claimed customer counts. These indicate traction in the SMB/marketing segment but do not replace audited revenue or independently measured market share.

	SlickText	SimpleTexting	EZ Texting
Starting Price	Entry-level pricing in the low-hundreds per month for a small credits package	Entry-level pricing typically in the low-hundreds per month, varies by number type and configuration	Entry-level pricing positioned at a lower entry point with tiered feature options
Target Segment	SMB–midmarket seeking a feature set oriented to SMS campaigns, with workflows and built-in features across plans (vendor materials)	Teams needing broader live support availability and flexible plan configuration by number type (vendor materials)	Teams seeking lower entry price with tiered features and enterprise options (vendor materials)
Key Strength	Positive review presence on platforms; support and rollover credits are frequently cited in user feedback and vendor docs	Emphasizes broader support availability and a clear pricing configurator; baseline multi-user support	Lower entry price and enterprise tier options; telecom fee and short-code capabilities vary by tier
Key Weakness	Costs can increase at high volumes; carrier pass-through fees and registration timelines add complexity	Pricing depends on number type and add-ons; total cost may exceed base comparisons	Credits/overages and pricing page structure can affect total cost depending on use

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

SlickText vs SimpleTexting

SimpleTexting highlights broader support availability and certain onboarding features, including weekend support in some configurations.
SlickText's materials indicate feature parity across plans and rollover credits; review-platform activity indicates substantial user feedback.
For organizations that require weekend operations/support, vendors that advertise broader support hours may be operationally better aligned.

SlickText vs Textedly

Textedly publishes pricing and support availability information that includes broader live chat hours in some plans.
Textedly discloses add-ons and surcharges that affect total cost.

SlickText vs EZ Texting

EZ Texting advertises a lower entry price but also outlines telecom fees and credit/overage structures that can affect real cost.
SlickText discloses carrier fees as pass-through charges; other vendors use different fee structures that may be simpler for budgeting but still represent additional costs.

Adoption trends / market signals

Growth signals for SlickText are largely derived from review-platform activity, vendor-reported awards, and vendor-claimed customer counts. These indicate traction in the SMB/marketing segment but do not replace audited revenue or independently measured market share.

	SlickText	SimpleTexting	EZ Texting
Starting Price	Entry-level pricing in the low-hundreds per month for a small credits package	Entry-level pricing typically in the low-hundreds per month, varies by number type and configuration	Entry-level pricing positioned at a lower entry point with tiered feature options
Target Segment	SMB–midmarket seeking a feature set oriented to SMS campaigns, with workflows and built-in features across plans (vendor materials)	Teams needing broader live support availability and flexible plan configuration by number type (vendor materials)	Teams seeking lower entry price with tiered features and enterprise options (vendor materials)
Key Strength	Positive review presence on platforms; support and rollover credits are frequently cited in user feedback and vendor docs	Emphasizes broader support availability and a clear pricing configurator; baseline multi-user support	Lower entry price and enterprise tier options; telecom fee and short-code capabilities vary by tier
Key Weakness	Costs can increase at high volumes; carrier pass-through fees and registration timelines add complexity	Pricing depends on number type and add-ons; total cost may exceed base comparisons	Credits/overages and pricing page structure can affect total cost depending on use