Solomon

Name: Solomon
Brand: Solomon

AI Native

Future-Proof Your Firm With Agentic AI Specialized for Tax

Est 2024|Valuation $43M|Raised $14.4M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 20

MarketsStatutory & Regulatory Reporting

- Solomon vs Filed/Numiro: Community comparisons suggest Filed/Numiro may be lower cost in some trials but had quality or turnaround issues in some reports; Solomon is reported in some anecdotes to have higher accuracy on complex returns. These are anecdotal observations and should be validated. - Solomon vs Tallyfor: Tallyfor focuses on automating the book-to-tax workflow, especially for ProConnect, rather than replacing preparers. Firms bottlenecked on return preparation may find Solomon more directly substitutive, while firms bottlenecked on trial-balance reconciliation may derive more value from Tallyfor. - Incumbent competitive pressure: Large tax-suite vendors are introducing agentic AI features that could reduce demand for third-party prep automation if AI capabilities are embedded within dominant tax suites.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Solomon vs Filed/Numiro: Community comparisons suggest Filed/Numiro may be lower cost in some trials but had quality or turnaround issues in some reports; Solomon is reported in some anecdotes to have higher accuracy on complex returns. These are anecdotal observations and should be validated.
Solomon vs Tallyfor: Tallyfor focuses on automating the book-to-tax workflow, especially for ProConnect, rather than replacing preparers. Firms bottlenecked on return preparation may find Solomon more directly substitutive, while firms bottlenecked on trial-balance reconciliation may derive more value from Tallyfor.
Incumbent competitive pressure: Large tax-suite vendors are introducing agentic AI features that could reduce demand for third-party prep automation if AI capabilities are embedded within dominant tax suites.

	Solomon (solomontax.ai)	Filed (formerly Numiro)	Tallyfor
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; community reports describe per-return pricing that varies by volume and complexity	Pricing not documented in the sources used here (rebrand announcement only)	Public tiered pricing is published using an ATB/binder unit model
Best For	Firms seeking an outsourced/AI-first preparer with a professional review step	Firms seeking an AI infrastructure for modern tax firms (post-rebrand positioning)	Firms focused on book-to-tax automation within ProConnect workflows
Key Strength	Anecdotal reports of handling complex returns and missing-document detection	Clear positioning and product narrative following rebrand	Transparent published pricing and self-serve purchasing for defined ATB units
Key Weakness	Inconsistent workpaper/PDF output and pricing opacity reported by community	Limited public detail in the sources reviewed here	Not positioned as an end-to-end outsourced tax-prep replacement