Solve

Name: Solve
Brand: SOLVE

We are an eco, multi-award winning SEO & Web Design agency based in Cornwall.

Est 1998|Raised $9M|5 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|Web traffic 1K|FTEs 18|HQ Newquay, England, GB

MarketsCustomer Engagement Platforms (CEP)Ecommerce Marketing Measurement

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation - Solve emphasizes reducing manual journey maintenance through reusable content blocks and algorithmic decisioning. - Competitors such as Klaviyo and Omnisend emphasize prebuilt eCommerce automation and broad ecosystem integrations that favor rapid onboarding. - Platforms like Customer.io, Braze, and Bloomreach typically offer more explicit journey orchestration controls, which some teams prefer for predictability and experimentation. Pricing comparison - Solve: custom quote, likely sales-led and potentially services-heavy. - Omnisend: public entry-level pricing and a free plan option. - Customer.io: public pricing tiers with documented entry-level pricing. Market adoption and share - Public information does not provide robust market share data for Solve. Public company profiles and databases indicate the vendor operates with a small team compared to large incumbents.

	Solve (solve.io)	Omnisend	Customer.io
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom quote)	Entry-level paid plans from the vendor; free plan available	Paid plans start at published tiers
Primary use case	DTC brands seeking unified data, analytics, and automated decisioning with a reduced focus on manual journey configuration	SMB to mid-market eCommerce teams seeking rapid time-to-value for email/SMS automation	Technical teams needing data-driven journeys and API-first workflow control
Key strengths	Positioning focused on reducing manual flow maintenance; emphasis on data ownership, analytics, and adaptive decisioning	Transparent entry-level pricing and accessible for rapid onboarding and basic automation	Mature workflow capabilities and strong data model with API control
Key weaknesses	Limited public third-party reviews; pricing and security certification details not publicly documented; potential implementation/service dependency	May be limiting for complex enterprise data models; costs can scale with contacts	More technical setup required; can be complex for small teams

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation

Solve emphasizes reducing manual journey maintenance through reusable content blocks and algorithmic decisioning.
Competitors such as Klaviyo and Omnisend emphasize prebuilt eCommerce automation and broad ecosystem integrations that favor rapid onboarding.
Platforms like Customer.io, Braze, and Bloomreach typically offer more explicit journey orchestration controls, which some teams prefer for predictability and experimentation.

Pricing comparison

Solve: custom quote, likely sales-led and potentially services-heavy.
Omnisend: public entry-level pricing and a free plan option.
Customer.io: public pricing tiers with documented entry-level pricing.

Market adoption and share

Public information does not provide robust market share data for Solve. Public company profiles and databases indicate the vendor operates with a small team compared to large incumbents.

	Solve (solve.io)	Omnisend	Customer.io
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (custom quote)	Entry-level paid plans from the vendor; free plan available	Paid plans start at published tiers
Primary use case	DTC brands seeking unified data, analytics, and automated decisioning with a reduced focus on manual journey configuration	SMB to mid-market eCommerce teams seeking rapid time-to-value for email/SMS automation	Technical teams needing data-driven journeys and API-first workflow control
Key strengths	Positioning focused on reducing manual flow maintenance; emphasis on data ownership, analytics, and adaptive decisioning	Transparent entry-level pricing and accessible for rapid onboarding and basic automation	Mature workflow capabilities and strong data model with API control
Key weaknesses	Limited public third-party reviews; pricing and security certification details not publicly documented; potential implementation/service dependency	May be limiting for complex enterprise data models; costs can scale with contacts	More technical setup required; can be complex for small teams