Solve Intelligence

Name: Solve Intelligence
Brand: Solve Intelligence
Rating: 4.9 (16 reviews)

AI Native

AI for patents | Trusted by 500+ IP teams globally | Y Combinator S23

Est 2023|Valuation $367M|Raised $55.5M|37 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 12K|Web traffic 48K|FTEs 59|HQ London, England, GB

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Solve vs DeepIP - DeepIP emphasizes native Word integration, which addresses the common workflow preference for in-Word drafting. - Solve emphasizes broader workflow coverage within a browser-based editor and configurable drafting styles. Solve vs PatentPal - PatentPal focuses on automating boilerplate specification text and figure generation and may be suitable where those are the principal pain points. - Solve targets a broader set of patent tasks, which may be valuable if a team needs prosecution drafting, claim charting, and invention harvesting in one platform. General legal AI - Generalist legal AI tools can assist with memos and research; patent work has domain-specific requirements tying claims, specification, figures, and jurisdictional practice together. Specialized tools may better address those domain needs.

Market adoption trends

Vendor and press statements report accelerated adoption, with customer-count figures varying by source. Buyers should reconcile differing public statements and verify adoption metrics during diligence.

	Solve Intelligence	DeepIP	PatentPal
Starting Price	Not publicly published; requires vendor engagement	Pricing information varies and may be found via vendor or partners	Offers trial options; pricing varied and subject to verification
Best For	Teams seeking an integrated platform for multiple patent workflows (harvesting, drafting, prosecution, charts)	Teams that require native Microsoft Word integration	Teams that prioritize rapid generation of specification sections and figures
Key Strength	Workflow coverage across multiple patent tasks and configurable drafting styles	Native Word integration that fits Word-centric workflows	Fast generation of spec sections and figure-related content
Key Weakness	Not Word-native; pricing transparency limited; limited independent review volume	May be narrower in workflow coverage depending on modules purchased	More narrowly focused; may not cover prosecution and charting comprehensively

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Solve vs DeepIP

DeepIP emphasizes native Word integration, which addresses the common workflow preference for in-Word drafting.
Solve emphasizes broader workflow coverage within a browser-based editor and configurable drafting styles.

Solve vs PatentPal

PatentPal focuses on automating boilerplate specification text and figure generation and may be suitable where those are the principal pain points.
Solve targets a broader set of patent tasks, which may be valuable if a team needs prosecution drafting, claim charting, and invention harvesting in one platform.

General legal AI

Generalist legal AI tools can assist with memos and research; patent work has domain-specific requirements tying claims, specification, figures, and jurisdictional practice together. Specialized tools may better address those domain needs.

Market adoption trends

	Solve Intelligence	DeepIP	PatentPal
Starting Price	Not publicly published; requires vendor engagement	Pricing information varies and may be found via vendor or partners	Offers trial options; pricing varied and subject to verification
Best For	Teams seeking an integrated platform for multiple patent workflows (harvesting, drafting, prosecution, charts)	Teams that require native Microsoft Word integration	Teams that prioritize rapid generation of specification sections and figures
Key Strength	Workflow coverage across multiple patent tasks and configurable drafting styles	Native Word integration that fits Word-centric workflows	Fast generation of spec sections and figure-related content
Key Weakness	Not Word-native; pricing transparency limited; limited independent review volume	May be narrower in workflow coverage depending on modules purchased	More narrowly focused; may not cover prosecution and charting comprehensively

Solve Intelligence

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption trends

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption trends

02Market Map